Lune

EMNLP2024Top-tier venue

On Training Data Influence of GPT Models

Yekun Chai, Qingyi Liu, Shuohuan Wang, Yu Sun, Qiwei Peng, Hua Wu

Abstract

Amidst the rapid advancements in generative language models, the investigation of how training data shapes the performance of GPT models is still emerging. This paper presents GPTfluence, a novel approach that leverages a featurized simulation to assess the impact of training examples on the training dynamics of GPT models. Our approach not only traces the influence of individual training instances on performance trajectories, such as loss and other key metrics, on targeted test points but also enables a comprehensive comparison with existing methods across various training scenarios in GPT models, ranging from 14 million to 2.8 billion parameters, across a range of downstream tasks. Contrary to earlier methods that struggle with generalization to new data, GPTfluence introduces a parameterized simulation of training dynamics, demonstrating robust generalization capabilities to unseen training data. This adaptability is evident across both fine-tuning and instruction-tuning scenarios, spanning tasks in natural language understanding and generation. We make our code and data publicly available at https:// github.com/ernie-research/gptfluence .

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 2 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers2

  1. Enhancing Training Data Attribution with Representational OptimizationWeiwei Sun, Haokun Liu, Nikhil Kandpal, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
  2. JI2S: Joint Influence-Aware Instruction Data Selection for Efficient Fine-TuningJingyu Wei, Bo Liu, Tianjiao Wan, Baoyun Peng et al.EMNLP 2025

Builds on7

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
  3. Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
  4. LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora et al.ICML 2024 · 460 citations
  5. TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at ScaleSung Min Park, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas, Guillaume Leclerc et al.ICML 2023 · 260 citations

Related papers

  1. GenSim: Generating Robotic Simulation Tasks via Large Language ModelsLirui Wang, Yiyang Ling, Zhecheng Yuan, Mohit Shridhar et al.ICLR 2024 · 143 citations
  2. Guess the Instruction! Flipped Learning Makes Language Models Stronger Zero-Shot LearnersSeonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim, Joel Jang, Joongbo Shin et al.ICLR 2023 · 10 citations
  3. G-DIG: Towards Gradient-based DIverse and hiGh-quality Instruction Data Selection for Machine TranslationXingyuan Pan, Luyang Huang, Liyan Kang, Zhicheng Liu et al.ACL 2024
  4. Neuron-Aware Data Selection in Instruction Tuning for Large Language ModelsXin Chen, Junchao Wu, Shu Yang, Runzhe Zhan et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
  5. G-Tuning: Improving Generalization of Pre-trained Language Models with Generative Adversarial NetworkRongxiang Weng, Wensen Cheng, Min ZhangACL Findings 2023 · 2 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines