Revisiting Pose Sensitivity in Splat-based Computed Tomography under Sparse-view Reconstruction
Kiseok Choi, Hyeongjun Cho, Inchul Kim, Min H. Kim
Abstract
X-ray computed tomography (CT) reconstructs volumetric representations of objects from projection images obtained by transmitting X-rays through a target. Recent splat-based tomography, which represents a volume as a continuous distribution of 3D Gaussians, has demonstrated both high reconstruction quality and fast convergence in cone-beam sparse-view CT. However, when deployed in real CT systems with limited and non-uniform view distributions, we observe distinctive streak and strip artifacts that are far more pronounced than in conventional reconstruction methods. Through detailed analysis, we show that these artifacts primarily originate from pose inaccuracies in the acquisition geometry rather than from view sparsity itself. We revisit pose sensitivity in the splatting formulation and derive a stable gradient-based framework that jointly refines geometric parameters during reconstruction. Our study not only identifies how pose perturbations propagate through the differentiable projection operator but also reveals why splat-based CT is particularly vulnerable to geometric misalignment. The resulting formulation remains lightweight and easily integrable into existing pipelines while substantially improving reconstruction fidelity under real-world sparse-view conditions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on11
- 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field RenderingBernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimkühler, George DrettakisSIGGRAPH 2023 · 5,687 citations
- IntraTomo: Self-supervised Learning-based Tomography via Sinogram Synthesis and PredictionGuangming Zang, Ramzi Idoughi, Rui Li, Peter Wonka et al.ICCV 2021 · 128 citations
- R2-Gaussian: Rectifying Radiative Gaussian Splatting for Tomographic ReconstructionRuyi Zha, Tao Jun Lin, Yuanhao Cai, Jiwen Cao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 99 citations
- NeAT: neural adaptive tomographyDarius Rückert, Yuanhao Wang, Rui Li, Ramzi Idoughi et al.SIGGRAPH 2022 · 60 citations
- Unsupervised Polychromatic Neural Representation for CT Metal Artifact ReductionQing Wu, Lixuan Chen, Ce Wang, Hongjiang Wei et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 31 citations
Related papers
- Exact-GS: Mathematically Rigorous and Accurate 3D Gaussian Splatting for 3D X-ray ReconstructionGuangpu Yang, Steffen Kieß, Hanxiang Luo, Xingyu Liu et al.CVPR 2026
- Splat-Based Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam CT via Compact Attenuation ModelingKiseok Choi, Jaemin Cho, Inchul Kim, Min H. KimCVPR 2026
- DDGS-CT: Direction-Disentangled Gaussian Splatting for Realistic Volume RenderingZhongpai Gao, Benjamin Planche, Meng Zheng, Xiao Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 34 citations
- AAA-Gaussians: Anti-Aliased and Artifact-Free 3D Gaussian RenderingMichael Steiner, Thomas Köhler, Lukas Radl, Felix Windisch et al.ICCV 2025 · 5 citations
- TG-Field: Geometry-Aware Radiative Gaussian Fields for Tomographic ReconstructionYuxiang Zhong, Jun Wei, Chaoqi Chen, Senyou An et al.AAAI 2026
