Zero-shot Faithfulness Evaluation for Text Summarization with Foundation Language Model
Qi Jia, Siyu Ren, Yizhu Liu, Kenny Q. Zhu
Abstract
Despite tremendous improvements in natural language generation, summarization models still suffer from the unfaithfulness issue. Previous work evaluates faithfulness either using models trained on the other tasks or in-domain synthetic data, or prompting a large model such as ChatGPT. This paper proposes to do zero-shot faithfulness evaluation simply with a moderately-sized foundation language model. We introduce a new metric FFLM, which is a combination of probability changes based on the intuition that prefixing a piece of text that is consistent with the output will increase the probability of predicting the output. Experiments show that FFLM performs competitively with or even outperforms ChatGPT on both inconsistency detection and faithfulness rating with 24x fewer parameters. FFLM also achieves improvements over other strong baselines. * The corresponding author. 1 We use the words "faithfulness", "consistency" and "(without) hallucination" interchangeably. Extrinsic hallucinations that are correct to the world knowledge are regarded as unfaithfulness in this work.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 759514a5-25b4-4b04-9c30-cb153bf4f830Cited by top-tier papers5
- Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software EngineeringRuiqi Wang, Jiyu Guo, Cuiyun Gao, Guodong Fan et al.ISSTA 2025 · 27 citations
- Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and ChallengesZhen Li, Xiaohan Xu, Tao Shen, Can Xu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 17 citations
- SARA: Salience-Aware Reinforced Adaptive Decoding for Large Language Models in Abstractive SummarizationNayu Liu, Junnan Zhu, Yiming Ma, Zhicong Lu et al.ACL 2025 · 7 citations
- Sequential-NIAH: A Needle-In-A-Haystack Benchmark for Extracting Sequential Needles from Long ContextsYifei Yu, Qian-Wen Zhang, Lingfeng Qiao, Di Yin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- FaithEval: Can Your Language Model Stay Faithful to Context, Even If "The Moon is Made of Marshmallows"Yifei Ming, Senthil Purushwalkam, Shrey Pandit, Zixuan Ke et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on19
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationJingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. LiuICML 2020 · 2,453 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model trainingJordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 566 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
Related papers
- Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multilingual SummarisationYifu Qiu, Yftah Ziser, Anna Korhonen, Edoardo Maria Ponti et al.EMNLP 2023 · 12 citations
- Do Automatic Factuality Metrics Measure Factuality? A Critical EvaluationSanjana Ramprasad, Byron C. WallaceNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- STORYSUMM: Evaluating Faithfulness in Story SummarizationMelanie Subbiah, Faisal Ladhak, Akankshya Mishra, Griffin Adams et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMsHwanjun Song, Hang Su, Igor Shalyminov, Jason Cai et al.ACL 2024
- Analyzing LLM Behavior in Dialogue Summarization: Unveiling Circumstantial Hallucination TrendsSanjana Ramprasad, Elisa Ferracane, Zachary C. LiptonACL 2024
