Multimodal Resource-Exhaustion Attacks on Vision-Language Models via Joint Pixel-Prompt Optimization
Zhaoxiong Ni, Yatie Xiao, Chi-Man Pun, Fei Peng, Qingxiao Guan, Keke Tang
Abstract
Resource-exhaustion attacks against autoregressive vision-language models (VLMs) typically assume unimodal threat models, treating the image branch as the primary optimization surface while holding user-visible prompts fixed. Even recent loop-centric variants remain confined to this single-channel paradigm, leaving the exploitation of availability unexplored as a cross-modal optimization problem over jointly controllable input surfaces.
We introduce Joint Pixel-Prompt Optimization (JPPO), the first compound adversarial framework elevating the visible prompt to a first-class adversarial variable alongside image perturbations. Under a restricted joint-input threat model, JPPO performs coupled, stagewise optimization over both the pixel and prompt surfaces. This produces synergistic cost amplification, mechanistically distinct from loop-dependent failures, exhibiting negligible loop incidence in our experiments.
Evaluating five open-source VLM families on MS COCO and ImageNet under an 8/255 infinity-norm budget, JPPO achieves over 4.6× latency and 5.3× energy amplification on Qwen2.5-VL-7B, and over 36.6× latency with 32.7× energy amplification on BLIP-2. This represents the strongest cost amplification among directly compared baselines while requiring substantially fewer optimization iterations. Ablations confirm this amplification arises from multimodal coordination rather than prompt length or isolated modalities. These findings reveal structural blind spots in current VLM serving defenses, motivating cost-aware robustness evaluation as a first-class security requirement for multimodal deployments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 759214da-60d7-4e8d-9783-4f8684d6a494Builds on22
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language ModelsJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2023 · 7,873 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
Related papers
- Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional Adversarial Attacks on Multi-Modal Language ModelsErfan Shayegani, Yue Dong, Nael B. Abu-GhazalehICLR 2024 · 271 citations
- Unveiling the Fragility of Vision-Language Models: Multi-Modal Adversarial Synergy via Texture-Constrained Perturbations and Cross-Modal OptimizationXiang Fang, Wanlong Fang, Changshuo WangAAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- LoopLLM: Transferable Energy-Latency Attacks in LLMs via Repetitive GenerationXingyu Li, Xiaolei Liu, Cheng Liu, Yixiao Xu et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- LingoLoop Attack: Trapping MLLMs via Linguistic Context and State Entrapment into Endless LoopsJiyuan Fu, Kaixun Jiang, Lingyi Hong, Jinglun Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Agents Under Siege: Breaking Pragmatic Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Optimized Prompt AttacksRana Muhammad Shahroz, Zhen Tan, Sukwon Yun, Charles Fleming et al.ACL 2025 · 18 citations
