The Impact of AI Trustworthiness Labels on the Perception of AI Products
Christina U. Pfeuffer
Abstract
Most often, potential users aren't well informed about the trustworthiness of AI products when selecting them. They may therefore show misplaced (dis-)trust towards AI products. Here, participants were presented with (hypothetical) AI products (smart fridges, voice assistants) of (hypothetical) brands that were paired with a graphical, traffic light-like label conveying low to high AI trustworthiness or they were presented with AI products without such a label (baseline). Higher trustworthiness levels as indicated by the AI trustworthiness labels increased trust, acceptance, and the intention to use AI products, as well as the monetary value participants attributed to AI products, but did not affect the evaluation of an AI product's brand. These findings suggest that labels effectively communicated differences in AI trustworthiness. Interestingly, the evaluation of unlabeled AI products corresponded to AI products labeled with an intermediate trustworthiness level, highlighting biased assessment and the need to communicate AI trustworthiness to potential users.
• Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Empirical studies in HCI; Human computer interaction (HCI); HCI design and evaluation methods; User studies; • Social and professional topics → Computing / technology policy; Government technology policy; Governmental regulations Security and privacy; Human and societal aspects of security and privacy; Privacy protections.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 755a0f1d-3c07-48fa-8246-bf7a9d85a122Builds on4
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- Human Reliance on Machine Learning Models When Performance Feedback is Limited: Heuristics and RisksZhuoran Lu, Ming YinCHI 2021 · 123 citations
- What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic ReviewYixuan Zhang, Joseph D. Gaggiano, Nutchanon Yongsatianchot, Nurul M. Suhaimi et al.CHI 2023 · 26 citations
- Comparing the Use and Usefulness of Four IoT Security LabelsPeter J. Caven, Zitao Zhang, Jacob Abbott, Xinyao Ma et al.CHI 2024 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Certified AI System = Trustworthy? Exploring Expert and Lay User Perceptions and Needs Regarding AI CertificationSarah Abdelwahab Gaballah, Nur Efsan Cetinkaya, Magdalena Wischnewski, Martina Angela SasseCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Labeling Synthetic Content: User Perceptions of Label Designs for AI-Generated Content on Social MediaDilrukshi Gamage, Dilki Sewwandi, Min Zhang, Arosha K. BandaraCHI 2025 · 25 citations
- "That's another doom I haven't thought about": A User Study on AI Labels as a Safeguard Against Image-Based MisinformationSandra Höltervennhoff, Jonas Ricker, Maike M. Raphael, Charlotte Schwedes et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Certified But Imperfect: Investigating The Role of AI Certifications And System Performance on Trust in And Reliance on AI SystemsMagdalena Wischnewski, Alisa Scharmann, Annika Ridder, Nicole C. KrämerCHI 2026
- Being Trustworthy is Not Enough: How Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) Can Deceive the End-Users and Gain Their TrustNikola Banovic, Zhuoran Yang, Aditya Ramesh, Alice LiuCSCW 2023 · 54 citations
