What University Students Learn In Visualization Classes
Maryam Hedayati, Matthew Kay
Abstract
As a step towards improving visualization literacy, this work investigates how students approach reading visualizations differently after taking a university-level visualization course. We asked students to verbally walk through their process of making sense of unfamiliar visualizations, and conducted a qualitative analysis of these walkthroughs. Our qualitative analysis found that after taking a visualization course, students engaged with visualizations in more sophisticated ways: they were more likely to exhibit design empathy by thinking critically about the tradeoffs behind why a chart was designed in a particular way, and were better able to deconstruct a chart to make sense of it. We also gave students a quantitative assessment of visualization literacy and found no evidence of scores improving after the class, likely because the test we used focused on a different set of skills than those emphasized in visualization classes. While current measurement instruments for visualization literacy are useful, we propose developing standardized assessments for additional aspects of visualization literacy, such as deconstruction and design empathy. We also suggest that these additional aspects could be incorporated more explicitly in visualization courses. All supplemental materials are available at https://osf.io/w5pum/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7553da4a-9d34-4332-91bd-35f5d01275c3Cited by top-tier papers4
- An Autoethnography on Visualization Literacy: A Wicked Measurement ProblemLily W. Ge, Anne-Flore Cabouat, Karen Bonilla, Yuan Cui et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 2 citations
- A Multiliteracy Model for Interactive Visualization Literacy: Definitions, Literacies, and Steps for Future ResearchGabriela Molina León, Benjamin Bach, Matheus Valentim, Niklas ElmqvistCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Improving Low-Vision Chart Accessibility via On-Cursor Visual ContextYotam Sechayk, Hennes Rave, Max Rädler, Mark Colley et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Probing the Visualization Literacy of Vision Language Models: The Good, the Bad, and the UglyLianghan Dong, Anamaria CrisanIEEE VIS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- CALVI: Critical Thinking Assessment for Literacy in VisualizationsLily W. Ge, Yuan Cui, Matthew KayCHI 2023 · 68 citations
- Challenges and Opportunities in Data Visualization Education: A Call to ActionBenjamin Bach, Mandy Keck, Fateme Rajabiyazdi, Tatiana Losev et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 58 citations
- Adaptive Assessment of Visualization LiteracyYuan Cui, Lily W. Ge, Yiren Ding, Fumeng Yang et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 26 citations
- Du Bois Wrapped Bar Chart: Visualizing Categorical Data with Disproportionate ValuesAlireza Karduni, Ryan Wesslen, Isaac Cho, Wenwen DouCHI 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- AVEC: An Assessment of Visual Encoding Ability in Visualization ConstructionLily W. Ge, Yuan Cui, Matthew KayCHI 2025 · 8 citations
- Beyond Time and Accuracy: Strategies in Visual Problem-SolvingEric Mörth, Zona Kostic, Nils Gehlenborg, Hanspeter Pfister et al.CHI 2025 · 2 citations
- Tell Me Without Telling Me: Two-Way Prediction of Visualization Literacy and Visual AttentionMinsuk Chang, Yao Wang, Huichen Will Wang, Yuanhong Zhou et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 1 citation
- Why Change My Design: Explaining Poorly Constructed Visualization Designs with Explorable ExplanationsLeo Yu-Ho Lo, Yifan Cao, Leni Yang, Huamin QuIEEE VIS 2023 · 6 citations
- Reading Between the Pixels: Investigating the Barriers to Visualization LiteracyCarolina Nobre, Kehang Zhu, Eric Mörth, Hanspeter Pfister et al.CHI 2024 · 21 citations
