CoreRec: A Counterfactual Correlation Inference for Next Set Recommendation
Kexin Li, Chengjiang Long, Shengyu Zhang, Xudong Tang, Zhichao Zhai, Kun Kuang, Jun Xiao
Abstract
The next set recommendation aims to predict the items that are likely to be bought in the next purchase. Central to this endeavor is the task of capturing intra-set and cross-set correlations among items. However, the modeling of cross-set correlations poses challenges due to specific issues. Primarily, these correlations are often implicit, and the prevailing approach of establishing an indiscriminate link across the entire set of objects neglects factors like purchase frequency and correlations between purchased items. Such hastily formed connections across sets introduce substantial noise. Additionally, the preeminence of high-frequency items in numerous sets could potentially overshadow and distort correlation modeling with respect to low-frequency items. Thus, we devoted to mitigating misleading inter-set correlations. With a fresh perspective rooted in causality, we delve into the question of whether correlations between a particular item and items from other sets should be relied upon for item representation learning and set prediction. Technically, we introduce the Counterfactual Correlation Inference framework for next set recommendation, denoted as CoreRec. This framework establishes a counterfactual scenario in which the recommendation model impedes cross-set correlations to generate intervened predictions. By contrasting these intervened predictions with the original ones, we gauge the causal impact of inter-set neighbors on set prediction-essentially assessing whether they contribute to spurious correlations. During testing, we introduce a post-trained switch module that selects between set-aware item representations derived from either the original or the counterfactual scenarios. To validate our approach, we extensively experiment using three real-world datasets, affirming both the effectiveness of CoreRec and the cogency of our analytical approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 75134cbb-81cb-4f5b-b5eb-20c2b9bf87f6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Global Context Enhanced Graph Neural Networks for Session-based RecommendationZiyang Wang, Wei Wei, Gao Cong, Xiao-Li Li et al.SIGIR 2020 · 558 citations
- Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender SystemTianxin Wei, Fuli Feng, Jiawei Chen, Ziwei Wu et al.KDD 2021 · 246 citations
- Clicks can be Cheating: Counterfactual Recommendation for Mitigating Clickbait IssueWenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Hanwang Zhang et al.SIGIR 2021 · 173 citations
- The World is Binary: Contrastive Learning for Denoising Next Basket RecommendationYuqi Qin, Pengfei Wang, Chenliang LiSIGIR 2021 · 138 citations
- Modeling Personalized Item Frequency Information for Next-basket RecommendationHaoji Hu, Xiangnan He, Jinyang Gao, Zhi-Li ZhangSIGIR 2020 · 134 citations
Related papers
- CSRec: Rethinking Sequential Recommendation from A Causal PerspectiveXiaoyu Liu, Jiaxin Yuan, Yuhang Zhou, Jingling Li et al.SIGIR 2025 · 7 citations
- Alleviating Spurious Correlations in Knowledge-aware Recommendations through Counterfactual GeneratorShanlei Mu, Yaliang Li, Wayne Xin Zhao, Jingyuan Wang et al.SIGIR 2022 · 23 citations
- A Counterfactual Collaborative Session-based Recommender SystemWenzhuo Song, Shoujin Wang, Yan Wang, Kunpeng Liu et al.WWW 2023 · 17 citations
- Multi-view Multi-aspect Neural Networks for Next-basket RecommendationZhiying Deng, Jianjun Li, Zhiqiang Guo, Wei Liu et al.SIGIR 2023 · 21 citations
- CauseRec: Counterfactual User Sequence Synthesis for Sequential RecommendationShengyu Zhang, Dong Yao, Zhou Zhao, Tat-Seng Chua et al.SIGIR 2021 · 118 citations
