Pursuing Minimal Sufficiency in Spatial Reasoning
Yejie Guo, Yunzhong Hou, Wufei Ma, Meng Tang, Ming-Hsuan Yang
Abstract
Spatial reasoning, the ability to ground language in 3D understanding, remains a persistent challenge for Vision-Language Models (VLMs). We identify two fundamental bottlenecks: inadequate 3D understanding capabilities stemming from 2D-centric pre-training, and reasoning failures induced by redundant 3D information. To address these, we first construct a Minimal Sufficient Set (MSS) of information before answering a given question: a compact selection of 3D perception results from expert models. We introduce MSSR (Minimal Sufficient Spatial Reasoner), a dual-agent framework that implements this principle. A Perception Agent programmatically queries 3D scenes using a versatile perception toolbox to extract sufficient information, including a novel SOG (Situated Orientation Grounding) module that robustly extracts language-grounded directions. A Reasoning Agent then iteratively refines this information to pursue minimality, pruning redundant details and requesting missing ones in a closed loop until the MSS is curated. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method, by explicitly pursuing both sufficiency and minimality, significantly improves accuracy and achieves state-of-the-art performance across two challenging benchmarks. Furthermore, our framework produces interpretable reasoning paths, offering a promising source of high-quality training data for future models. Source code is available at https://github.com/gyj155/mssr . * Equal contribution. † Work done while visiting UC Merced.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 74acfede-7f63-465d-b1ac-fed73c044464Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on29
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for ReasoningDídac Surís, Sachit Menon, Carl VondrickICCV 2023 · 732 citations
- 3D-LLM: Injecting the 3D World into Large Language ModelsYining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 662 citations
- SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsAn-Chieh Cheng, Hongxu Yin, Yang Fu, Qiushan Guo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 412 citations
Related papers
- SpatialReasoner: Towards Explicit and Generalizable 3D Spatial ReasoningWufei Ma, Yu-Cheng Chou, Qihao Liu, Xingrui Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 77 citations
- TopViewRS: Vision-Language Models as Top-View Spatial ReasonersChengzu Li, Caiqi Zhang, Han Zhou, Nigel Collier et al.EMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
- Spatial Understanding from Videos: Structured Prompts Meet Simulation DataHaoyu Zhang, Meng Liu, Zaijing Li, Haokun Wen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
- Open-World 3D Scene Graph Generation for Retrieval-Augmented ReasoningFei Yu, Quan Deng, Shengeng Tang, Yuehua Li et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Think with 3D: Geometric Imagination Grounded Spatial Reasoning from Limited ViewsZhangquan Chen, Manyuan Zhang, Xinlei Yu, Xufang Luo et al.CVPR 2026 · 61 citations
