Central moment analysis for cost accumulators in probabilistic programs
Di Wang, Jan Hoffmann, Thomas W. Reps
Abstract
For probabilistic programs, it is usually not possible to automatically derive exact information about their properties, such as the distribution of states at a given program point. Instead, one can attempt to derive approximations, such as upper bounds on tail probabilities. Such bounds can be obtained via concentration inequalities, which rely on the moments of a distribution, such as the expectation (the first raw moment) or the variance (the second central moment). Tail bounds obtained using central moments are often tighter than the ones obtained using raw moments, but automatically analyzing central moments is more challenging.
This paper presents an analysis for probabilistic programs that automatically derives symbolic upper and lower bounds on variances, as well as higher central moments, of cost accumulators. To overcome the challenges of higher-moment analysis, it generalizes analyses for expectations with an algebraic abstraction that simultaneously analyzes different moments, utilizing relations between them. A key innovation is the notion of moment-polymorphic recursion, and a practical derivation system that handles recursive functions.
The analysis has been implemented using a templatebased technique that reduces the inference of polynomial bounds to linear programming. Experiments with our prototype central-moment analyzer show that, despite the analyzer's upper/lower bounds on various quantities, it obtains tighter tail bounds than an existing system that uses only raw moments, such as expectations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 74804111-f9a6-4be3-9f56-cd6b44e39a49Cited by top-tier papers18
- This is the moment for probabilistic loopsMarcel Moosbrugger, Miroslav Stankovic, Ezio Bartocci, Laura KovácsOOPSLA 2022 · 30 citations
- Data-Driven Invariant Learning for Probabilistic ProgramsJialu Bao, Nitesh Trivedi, Drashti Pathak, Justin Hsu et al.CAV 2022 · 20 citations
- Symbolic execution for randomized programsZachary Susag, Sumit Lahiri, Justin Hsu, Subhajit RoyOOPSLA 2022 · 17 citations
- Quantitative Bounds on Resource Usage of Probabilistic ProgramsKrishnendu Chatterjee, Amir Kafshdar Goharshady, Tobias Meggendorfer, Dorde ZikelicOOPSLA 2024 · 16 citations
- Does a Program Yield the Right Distribution? - Verifying Probabilistic Programs via Generating FunctionsMingshuai Chen, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Lutz Klinkenberg, Tobias WinklerCAV 2022 · 14 citations
Builds on2
- Verifying and Synthesizing Constant-Resource Implementations with TypesVan Chan Ngo, Mario Dehesa-Azuara, Matthew Fredrikson, Jan HoffmannS&P 2017 · 51 citations
- Aiming low is harder: induction for lower bounds in probabilistic program verificationMarcel Hark, Benjamin Lucien Kaminski, Jürgen Giesl, Joost-Pieter KatoenPOPL 2020 · 47 citations
Related papers
- Piecewise Analysis of Probabilistic Programs via 𝑘-InductionTengshun Yang, Shenghua Feng, Hongfei Fu, Naijun Zhan et al.POPL 2026
- Highly Incremental: A Simple Programmatic Approach for Many ObjectivesPhilipp Schröer, Joost-Pieter KatoenFM 2026 · 1 citation
- Quantitative analysis of assertion violations in probabilistic programsJinyi Wang, Yican Sun, Hongfei Fu, Krishnendu Chatterjee et al.PLDI 2021 · 18 citations
- Automated Expected Value Analysis of Recursive ProgramsMartin Avanzini, Georg Moser, Michael SchaperPLDI 2023 · 6 citations
- A modular cost analysis for probabilistic programsMartin Avanzini, Georg Moser, Michael SchaperOOPSLA 2020 · 41 citations
