Back to Basics: Let Denoising Generative Models Denoise
Tianhong Li, Kaiming He
Abstract
Today's denoising diffusion models do not "denoise" in the classical sense, i.e., they do not directly predict clean images. Rather, the neural networks predict noise or a noised quantity. In this paper, we suggest that predicting clean data and predicting noised quantities are fundamentally different. According to the manifold assumption, natural data should lie on a low-dimensional manifold, whereas noised quantities do not. With this assumption, we advocate for models that directly predict clean data, which allows apparently under-capacity networks to operate effectively in very high-dimensional spaces. We show that simple, large-patch Transformers on pixels can be strong generative models: using no tokenizer, no pre-training, and no extra loss. Our approach is conceptually nothing more than "Just image Transformers", or JiT, as we call it. We report competitive results using JiT with large patch sizes of 16 and 32 on ImageNet at resolutions of 256 and 512, where predicting high-dimensional noised quantities can fail catastrophically. With our networks mapping back to the basics of the manifold, our research goes back to basics and pursues a self-contained paradigm for Transformer-based diffusion on raw natural data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers24
- What matters for Representation Alignment: Global Information or Spatial Structure?Jaskirat Singh, Xingjian Leng, Zongze Wu, Liang Zheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 84 citations
- PixelDiT: Pixel Diffusion Transformers for Image GenerationYongsheng Yu, Wei Xiong, Weili Nie, Yichen Sheng et al.CVPR 2026 · 82 citations
- DeCo: Frequency-Decoupled Pixel Diffusion for End-to-End Image GenerationZehong Ma, Longhui Wei, Shuai Wang, Shiliang Zhang et al.CVPR 2026 · 59 citations
- DiP: Taming Diffusion Models in Pixel SpaceZhennan Chen, Junwei Zhu, Xu Chen, Jiangning Zhang et al.CVPR 2026 · 46 citations
- There is No VAE: End-to-End Pixel-Space Generative Modeling via Self-Supervised Pre-TrainingJiachen Lei, Keli Liu, Julius Berner, Y HoiM et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
Builds on28
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
Related papers
- Scalable Diffusion Models with TransformersWilliam Peebles, Saining XieICCV 2023 · 5,568 citations
- PointDiT: Pixel-Space Diffusion for Monocular Geometry EstimationHaofei Xu, Rundi Wu, Philipp Henzler, Nikolai Kalischek et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- On Inductive Biases That Enable Generalization in Diffusion TransformersJie An, De Wang, Pengsheng Guo, Jiebo Luo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- PixNerd: Pixel Neural Field DiffusionShuai Wang, Ziteng Gao, Chenhui Zhu, Weilin Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 78 citations
- Latent Forcing: Reordering the Diffusion Trajectory for Pixel-Space Image GenerationAlan Baade, Eric Chan, Kyle Sargent, Changan Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 25 citations
