B lur D riving : Investigating How Personalized Blur Techniques Impact Drivers' Performance in Virtual Reality
Yuan Li, Mark Colley, Xinyue Gui, Cristian Camilo Rendon Cardona, Pascal Jansen, Christian Sandor, Takeo Igarashi
Abstract
Distracted driving remains a major safety concern, motivating approaches that aim to reduce visual overload before attention breaks down. However, visual overload varies across individuals, making it difficult to determine appropriate interventions for each driver. We investigate whether controllable visual blur can simplify the driving scene and mitigate distraction. To address this challenge, we propose B lur D riving , a target-selective, distance-aware blur system in a Virtual Reality (VR) urban driving simulator, and employ a Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization (HITL-MOBO) framework to personalize blur configurations. Across two VR user studies, we evaluated driving under normal conditions in Study 1 and under cognitively demanding conditions in Study 2. We found that personalization revealed strong individual differences in blur preference but did not lead to significant improvements in objective driving performance compared to a no-blur baseline. Qualitative feedback revealed polarized responses: some drivers reported improved focus, while others experienced uncertainty, fatigue, or discomfort. These findings suggest that visual blur is not universally effective. Instead, its benefits depend on individual perceptual strategies and tolerance for visual uncertainty. This work highlights the limits of personalized visual simplification in safety-critical driving and informs adaptive in-vehicle interface design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 74475a4e-faf2-4fe1-833b-2e27c0d83f5dBuilds on16
- BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian OptimizationMaximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel R. Jiang, Samuel Daulton et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 686 citations
- Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Designing Interaction TechniquesLiwei Chan, Yi-Chi Liao, George B. Mo, John J. Dudley et al.CHI 2022 · 94 citations
- Sequential gallery for interactive visual design optimizationYuki Koyama, Issei Sato, Masataka GotoSIGGRAPH 2020 · 90 citations
- A Longitudinal Video Study on Communicating Status and Intent for Self-Driving Vehicle - Pedestrian InteractionStefanie M. Faas, Andrea C. Kao, Martin BaumannCHI 2020 · 80 citations
- Towards Understanding Diminished RealityYifei Cheng, Hang Yin, Yukang Yan, Jan Gugenheimer et al.CHI 2022 · 76 citations
Related papers
- OptiCarVis: Improving Automated Vehicle Functionality Visualizations Using Bayesian Optimization to Enhance User ExperiencePascal Jansen, Mark Colley, Svenja Krauß, Daniel Hirschle et al.CHI 2025 · 19 citations
- The Effect of Context Switching, Focal Switching Distance, Binocular and Monocular Viewing, and Transient Focal Blur on Human Performance in Optical See-Through Augmented RealityMohammed Safayet Arefin, Nate Phillips, Alexander Plopski, Joseph L. Gabbard et al.IEEE VR 2022 · 40 citations
- Fly Away: Evaluating the Impact of Motion Fidelity on Optimized User Interface Design via Bayesian Optimization in Automated Urban Air Mobility SimulationsLuca-Maxim Meinhardt, Clara Schramm, Pascal Jansen, Mark Colley et al.CHI 2025 · 5 citations
- ProVoice: Designing Proactive Functionality for In-Vehicle Conversational Assistants using Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization to Enhance Driver ExperienceJosh Susak, Yifu Liu, Pascal Jansen, Mark ColleyCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- You Shall Not Pass: Warning Drivers of Unsafe Overtaking Maneuvers on Country Roads by Predicting Safe Sight DistanceAdrian Bauske, Arthur FleigCHI 2025
