The Hidden Dimensions of LLM Alignment: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Orthogonal Safety Directions
Wenbo Pan, Zhichao Liu, Qiguang Chen, Xiangyang Zhou, Haining Yu, Xiaohua Jia
Abstract
Large Language Models' safety-aligned behaviors, such as refusing harmful queries, can be represented by linear directions in activation space. Previous research modeled safety behavior with a single direction, limiting mechanistic understanding to an isolated safety feature. In this work, we discover that safety-aligned behavior is jointly controlled by multi-dimensional directions. Namely, we study the vector space of representation shifts during safety fine-tuning on Llama 3 8B for refusing jailbreaks. By studying orthogonal directions in the space, we first find that a dominant direction governs the model's refusal behavior, while multiple smaller directions represent distinct and interpretable features like hypothetical narrative and role-playing. We then measure how different directions promote or suppress the dominant direction, showing the important role of secondary directions in shaping the model's refusal representation. Finally, we demonstrate that removing certain trigger tokens in harmful queries can mitigate these directions to bypass the learned safety capability, providing new insights on understanding safety alignment vulnerability from a multi-dimensional perspective. Code and artifacts are available at https://github.com/ BMPixel/safety-residual-space .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Safety Subspaces are Not Linearly Distinct: A Fine-Tuning Case StudyKaustubh Ponkshe, Shaan Shah, Raghav Singhal, Praneeth VepakommaICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- SOM Directions Are Better than One: Multi-Directional Refusal Suppression in Language ModelsGiorgio Piras, Raffaele Mura, Fabio Brau, Luca Oneto et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Safety Depth in Large Language Models: A Markov Chain PerspectiveChing-Chia Kao, Chia-Mu Yu, Chun-Shien Lu, Chu-Song ChenNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Toward Stable Value Alignment: Introducing Independent Modules for Consistent Value GuidanceWenhao Chen, Sirui Sun, Shengyuan Bai, Guojie SongICML 2026
- Detecting What Queries Seek: Steering LLM Safety with FFN Output Activation MonitoringXiaohao Luo, Ying Wei, Rui ZhaoACL 2026
Builds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,166 citations
Related papers
- The Geometry of Refusal in Large Language Models: Concept Cones and Representational IndependenceTom Wollschläger, Jannes Elstner, Simon Geisler, Vincent Cohen-Addad et al.ICML 2025
- LLMs Encode Harmfulness and Refusal SeparatelyJiachen Zhao, Jing Huang, Zhengxuan Wu, David Bau et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 93 citations
- Attack via Overfitting: 10-shot Benign Fine-tuning to Jailbreak LLMsZhixin Xie, Xurui Song, Jun LuoNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety BasinShuo Yang, Qihui Zhang, Yuyang Liu, Yue Huang et al.AAAI 2026 · 19 citations
- ASGuard: Activation-Scaling Guard to Mitigate Targeted Jailbreaking AttackYein Park, Jungwoo Park, Jaewoo KangICLR 2026 · 2 citations
