USENIX Security2026Top-tier venue
MATE: Policy-Aware Security Auditing for Mobile Agents via Synthesis-Driven Trajectory Learning
Changyue Jiang, Jiayi Wang, Xin Wen, Jiarun Dai, Geng Hong, Xudong Pan
Abstract
Mobile agents powered by foundation models now automate complex, multi-step workflows on real devices, but their trajectories can violate app-specific security policies. Existing trajectory-level defenses rely on LLM prompting or rigid rules, and thus fail to support fine-grained, natural-language policies that generalize across apps and tasks. In this work, we introduce MATE, a lightweight, policy-conditioned auditor that encodes both agent trajectories and natural-language security policies to determine whether a trajectory violates a given policy and to explain why. Treating policies as editable text rather than fixed model parameters allows MATE to handle user-defined and evolving requirements without retraining. To construct MATE, we build a knowledge base by extracting app descriptions, workflows, and policies from hundreds of popular mobile apps worldwide, and synthesizing over 140K semantically realistic, policy-conditioned trajectories with a multi-stage pipeline. We further release MATEBench, a trajectory-level auditing benchmark with two synthetic subsets and one real-world subset of manually collected trajectories. Models trained with our synthesis-driven trajectory learning achieve over 95% accuracy on MATEBench, retain strong performance on external safety benchmarks, and audit trajectories from Zhipu's AutoGLM and Alibaba's Mobile-Agent on real devices with over 95% accuracy, outperforming prior methods by over 20%. MATE shows that practical, fine-grained security auditing for heterogeneous mobile agents is both feasible and effective.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 73e73a84-3861-4f1e-b34e-ecda18cde28bBuilds on25
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous AgentsShuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,197 citations
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
- GPT-4V(ision) is a Generalist Web Agent, if GroundedBoyuan Zheng, Boyu Gou, Jihyung Kil, Huan Sun et al.ICML 2024 · 496 citations
- Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated SandboxYangjun Ruan, Honghua Dong, Andrew Wang, Silviu Pitis et al.ICLR 2024 · 292 citations
Related papers
- Learning Efficient Guardrails for ComplianceXiaofei Wen, Wenjie Mo, Yanan Xie, Peng Qi et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- AgentAuditor: Human-level Safety and Security Evaluation for LLM AgentsHanjun Luo, Shenyu Dai, Chiming Ni, Xinfeng Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 98 citations
- Trajectory2Task: Training Robust Tool-Calling Agents with Synthesized Yet Verifiable Data for Complex User IntentsZiyi Wang, Yuxuan Lu, Yimeng Zhang, Pei Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 9 citations
- GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents via Knowledge-Enabled ReasoningZhen Xiang, Linzhi Zheng, Yanjie Li, Junyuan Hong et al.ICML 2025
- Explainable and Fine-Grained Safeguarding of LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Bi-Level Graph Anomaly DetectionJunjun Pan, Yixin Liu, Rui Miao, Kaize Ding et al.ACL 2026 · 6 citations
