Data Laundering: Artificially Boosting Benchmark Results through Knowledge Distillation
Jonibek Mansurov, Akhmed Sakip, Alham Fikri Aji
Abstract
In this paper, we show that knowledge distillation can be subverted to manipulate language model benchmark scores, revealing a critical vulnerability in current evaluation practices. We introduce "Data Laundering," a process that enables the covert transfer of benchmarkspecific knowledge through seemingly legitimate intermediate training steps. Through extensive experiments with a 2-layer BERT student model, we show how this approach can achieve substantial improvements in benchmark accuracy (up to 75% on GPQA) without developing genuine reasoning capabilities. Notably, this method can be exploited intentionally or even unintentionally, as researchers may inadvertently adopt this method and inflate scores without realising the implications. While our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique, we present them as a cautionary tale highlighting the urgent need for more robust evaluation methods in AI. This work aims to contribute to the ongoing discussion about evaluation integrity in AI development and the need for benchmarks that more accurately reflect true model capabilities. The code is available at https://github. com/mbzuai-nlp/data_laundering .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 73db4eeb-ab46-469f-b8b8-ad2a1200d607Cited by top-tier papers2
- Scaling Low-Resource MT via Synthetic Data Generation with LLMsOna de Gibert, Joseph Attieh, Teemu Vahtola, Mikko Aulamo et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Knowledge Distillation as Decontamination? Revisiting the "Data Laundering" Concern in Classification TasksHengyu Luo, Raúl Vázquez, Timothee Mickus, Filip Ginter et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on8
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language ModelsShahriar Golchin, Mihai SurdeanuICLR 2024 · 165 citations
- MiniLLM: Knowledge Distillation of Large Language ModelsYuxian Gu, Li Dong, Furu Wei, Minlie HuangICLR 2024 · 95 citations
- DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language ModelsJongwoo Ko, Sungnyun Kim, Tianyi Chen, Se-Young YunICML 2024 · 86 citations
Related papers
- Can LLM Watermarks Robustly Prevent Unauthorized Knowledge Distillation?Leyi Pan, Aiwei Liu, Shiyu Huang, Yijian Lu et al.ACL 2025 · 10 citations
- Protecting Language Models Against Unauthorized Distillation through Trace RewritingXinhang Ma, William Yeoh, Ning Zhang, Yevgeniy VorobeychikACL 2026 · 6 citations
- DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs EvaluationCheng Xu, Nan Yan, Shuhao Guan, Changhong Jin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 7 citations
- Training on the Benchmark Is Not All You NeedShiwen Ni, Xiangtao Kong, Chengming Li, Xiping Hu et al.AAAI 2025 · 24 citations
- The Quest for Efficient Reasoning: A Data-Centric Benchmark to CoT DistillationRuichen Zhang, Rana Muhammad Shahroz Khan, Zhen Tan, Dawei Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
