The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernels
Jonas M. Kübler, Simon Buchholz, Bernhard Schölkopf
Abstract
It has been hypothesized that quantum computers may lend themselves well to applications in machine learning. In the present work, we analyze function classes defined via quantum kernels. Quantum computers offer the possibility to efficiently compute inner products of exponentially large density operators that are classically hard to compute. However, having an exponentially large feature space renders the problem of generalization hard. Furthermore, being able to evaluate inner products in high dimensional spaces efficiently by itself does not guarantee a quantum advantage, as already classically tractable kernels can correspond to highor infinite-dimensional reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS). We analyze the spectral properties of quantum kernels and find that we can expect an advantage if their RKHS is low dimensional and contains functions that are hard to compute classically. If the target function is known to lie in this class, this implies a quantum advantage, as the quantum computer can encode this inductive bias, whereas there is no classically efficient way to constrain the function class in the same way. However, we show that finding suitable quantum kernels is not easy because the kernel evaluation might require exponentially many measurements. In conclusion, our message is a somewhat sobering one: we conjecture that quantum machine learning models can offer speed-ups only if we manage to encode knowledge about the problem at hand into quantum circuits, while encoding the same bias into a classical model would be hard. These situations may plausibly occur when learning on data generated by a quantum process, however, they appear to be harder to come by for classical datasets. * JMK and SB contributed equally and are ordered randomly. 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 733d65ac-1611-4646-bd93-bb89540d113dCited by top-tier papers6
- Concentration of Data Encoding in Parameterized Quantum CircuitsGuangxi Li, Ruilin Ye, Xuanqiang Zhao, Xin WangNeurIPS 2022 · 42 citations
- Harmonic Neural NetworksAtiyo Ghosh, Antonio Andrea Gentile, Mario Dagrada, Chul Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 37 citations
- Elivagar: Efficient Quantum Circuit Search for ClassificationSashwat Anagolum, Narges Alavisamani, Poulami Das, Moinuddin K. Qureshi et al.ASPLOS 2024 · 19 citations
- Neural Auto-designer for Enhanced Quantum KernelsCong Lei, Yuxuan Du, Peng Mi, Jun Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 12 citations
- Equivariant Quantum Graph CircuitsPéter Mernyei, Konstantinos Meichanetzidis, Ismail Ilkan CeylanICML 2022 · 9 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Classically Approximating Variational Quantum Machine Learning with Random Fourier FeaturesJonas Landman, Slimane Thabet, Constantin Dalyac, Hela Mhiri et al.ICLR 2023 · 5 citations
- Learning with Optimized Random Features: Exponential Speedup by Quantum Machine Learning without Sparsity and Low-Rank AssumptionsHayata Yamasaki, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian, Sho Sonoda, Masato KoashiNeurIPS 2020 · 23 citations
- Exponential Quantum Communication Advantage in Distributed Inference and LearningDar Gilboa, Hagay Michaeli, Daniel Soudry, Jarrod R. McCleanNeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- Quantum machine learning advantages beyond hardness of evaluationRiccardo Molteni, Simon Callum Marshall, Vedran DunjkoICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Realizing Quantum Kernel Models at Scale with Matrix Product State SimulationMekena Metcalf, Pablo Andrés-Martínez, Nathan FitzpatrickSC 2024 · 3 citations
