Expanding Reasoning Potential in Foundation Model by Learning Diverse Chains of Thought Patterns
Xuemiao Zhang, Can Ren, Chengying Tu, Rongxiang Weng, Shuo Wang, Hongfei Yan, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai
Abstract
Recent progress in large reasoning models for challenging mathematical reasoning has been driven by reinforcement learning (RL). Incorporating long chain-of-thought (CoT) data during mid-training has also been shown to substantially improve reasoning depth. However, current approaches often utilize CoT data indiscriminately, leaving open the critical question of which data types most effectively enhance model reasoning capabilities. In this paper, we define the foundation model's reasoning potential for the first time as the inverse of the number of independent attempts required to correctly answer the question, which is strongly correlated with the final model performance. We then propose utilizing diverse data enriched with high-value reasoning patterns to expand the reasoning potential. Specifically, we abstract atomic reasoning patterns from CoT sequences, characterized by commonality and inductive capabilities, and use them to construct a core reference set enriched with valuable reasoning patterns. Furthermore, we propose a dual-granularity algorithm involving chains of reasoning patterns and token entropy, efficiently selecting high-value CoT data (CoTP) from the data pool that aligns with the core set, thereby training models to master reasoning effectively. Only 10B-token CoTP data enables the 85A6B Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model to improve by 9.58% on the challenging AIME 2024 and 2025, and to raise the upper bound of downstream RL performance by 7.81%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 72d4cbd3-8cc1-4d0f-96ce-1b098fd374c4Builds on6
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 592 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMsXumeng Wen, Zihan Liu, Shun Zheng, Shengyu Ye et al.ICLR 2026 · 279 citations
- JiuZhang3.0: Efficiently Improving Mathematical Reasoning by Training Small Data Synthesis ModelsKun Zhou, Beichen Zhang, Jiapeng Wang, Zhipeng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 62 citations
Related papers
- Scaling Code-Assisted Chain-of-Thoughts and Instructions for Model ReasoningHonglin Lin, Qizhi Pei, Zhuoshi Pan, Yu Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Enhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning PatternsYufeng Zhang, Xuepeng Wang, Lingxiang Wu, Jinqiao WangAAAI 2025 · 27 citations
- Analyzing the Power of Chain of Thought through Memorization CapabilitiesLijia Yu, Xiao-Shan Gao, Lijun ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- CodeIO: Condensing Reasoning Patterns via Code Input-Output PredictionJunlong Li, Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Runxin Xu et al.ICML 2025
- Front-Loading Reasoning: The Synergy between Pretraining and Post-Training DataSyeda Nahida Akter, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Eric Nyberg, Mostofa Patwary et al.ICLR 2026 · 27 citations
