Question-Answer Extraction from Scientific Articles Using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models
Hosein Azarbonyad, Zi Long Zhu, Georgios Cheirmpos, Zubair Afzal, Vikrant Yadav, Georgios Tsatsaronis
Abstract
When deciding to read an article or incorporate it into their research, scholars often seek to quickly identify and understand its main ideas. In this paper, we aim to extract these key concepts and contributions from scientific articles in the form of Question and Answer (QA) pairs. We propose two distinct approaches for generating QAs. The first approach involves selecting salient paragraphs, using a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate questions, ranking these questions by the likelihood of obtaining meaningful answers, and subsequently generating answers. This method relies exclusively on the content of the articles. However, assessing an article's novelty typically requires comparison with the existing literature. Therefore, our second approach leverages a Knowledge Graph (KG) for QA generation. We construct a KG by fine-tuning an Entity Relationship (ER) extraction model on scientific articles and using it to build the graph. We then employ a salient triplet extraction method to select the most pertinent ERs per article, utilizing metrics such as the centrality of entities based on a triplet TF-IDF-like measure. This measure assesses the saliency of a triplet based on its importance within the article compared to its prevalence in the literature. For evaluation, we generate QAs using both approaches and have them assessed by Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) through a set of predefined metrics to evaluate the quality of both questions and answers. Our evaluations demonstrate that the KG-based approach effectively captures the main ideas discussed in the articles. Furthermore, our findings indicate that fine-tuning the ER extraction model on our scientific corpus is crucial for extracting high-quality triplets from such documents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 725cd288-e0c2-4860-8a95-a073c961cf55Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language ModelsPotsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. GalesEMNLP 2023 · 331 citations
- Revisiting Relation Extraction in the era of Large Language ModelsSomin Wadhwa, Silvio Amir, Byron C. WallaceACL 2023 · 145 citations
- Retrieval-guided Counterfactual Generation for QABhargavi Paranjape, Matthew Lamm, Ian TenneyACL 2022 · 39 citations
Related papers
- GSAP-ERE: Fine-Grained Scholarly Entity and Relation Extraction Focused on Machine LearningWolfgang Otto, Lu Gan, Sharmila Upadhyaya, Saurav Karmakar et al.AAAI 2026
- Scaling Knowledge Graph Construction through Synthetic Data Generation and DistillationPrafulla Kumar Choubey, Xin Su, Man Luo, XIANGYU PENG et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Mixture of Knowledge Minigraph Agents for Literature Review GenerationZhi Zhang, Yan Liu, Sheng-hua Zhong, Gong Chen et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- LLMs as Knowledge Graph Refiners: Mitigating Factual Inconsistencies in Generative Knowledge ExtractionDonghyun Kim, Hyeongjun Yang, Seokju Hwang, Kyong-Ho Lee et al.ACL 2026
- Knowledge Graph Prompting for Multi-Document Question AnsweringYu Wang, Nedim Lipka, Ryan A. Rossi, Alexa F. Siu et al.AAAI 2024 · 290 citations
