Scaling Towards the Information Boundary of Instructions through Data Synthesizing
Li Du, Hanyu Zhao, Yiming Ju, Tengfei Pan
Abstract
Instruction tuning has become a foundation for unlocking the capabilities of large-scale pretrained models and improving their performance on complex tasks. Thus, the construction of high-quality instruction datasets is crucial for enhancing model performance and generalizability. Although current instruction datasets have reached tens of millions of samples, models finetuned on them may still struggle with complex instruction following and tasks in rare domains. This is primarily due to limited expansion in both "coverage" (coverage of task types and knowledge areas) and "depth" (instruction complexity) of the instruction set. To address this issue, we propose a systematic instruction data construction framework, which integrates a hierarchical tagging system, an informative seed selection algorithm, an evolutionary data synthesis process, and a model deficiency diagnosis with targeted data generation. These components form an iterative closed-loop to continuously enhance the coverage and depth of instruction data. Based on this framework, we construct Infinity Instruct Subject, a high-quality dataset containing ∼1.5 million instructions. Experiments on multiple foundation models and benchmark tasks demonstrate its effectiveness in improving instruction-following capabilities. Further analyses suggest that Infinity Instruct Subject shows enlarged coverage and depth compared to comparable synthesized instruction datasets. Our work lays a theoretical and practical foundation for the efficient, continuous evolution of instruction datasets, moving from data quantity expansion to qualitative improvement.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7250052b-442b-43ff-af0d-2d647fec7aa9Builds on19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
- CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep Reinforcement LearningHung Le, Yue Wang, Akhilesh Deepak Gotmare, Silvio Savarese et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 571 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
Related papers
- Specialist or Generalist? Instruction Tuning for Specific NLP TasksChufan Shi, Yixuan Su, Cheng Yang, Yujiu Yang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 11 citations
- Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human LaborOr Honovich, Thomas Scialom, Omer Levy, Timo SchickACL 2023 · 92 citations
- AQuilt: Weaving Logic and Self-Inspection into Low-Cost, High-Relevance Data Synthesis for Specialist LLMsXiaopeng Ke, Hexuan Deng, Xuebo Liu, Jun Rao et al.EMNLP 2025
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
- From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction DataHang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou et al.ACL 2026
