Physical vs. Logical Indexing with IDEA: Inverted Deduplication-Aware Index
Asaf Levi, Philip Shilane, Sarai Sheinvald, Gala Yadgar
Abstract
In the realm of information retrieval, the need to maintain reliable term-indexing has grown more acute in recent years, with vast amounts of ever-growing online data used for data mining and natural language processing, and searched by a large number of search-engine users. At the same time, an increasing portion of primary storage systems employ data deduplication, where duplicate logical data chunks are replaced with references to a unique physical copy. We show that indexing deduplicated data with deduplication-oblivious mechanisms might result in extreme inefficiencies: the index size would increase in proportion to the logical data size, regardless of its duplication ratio, consuming excessive storage and memory and slowing down lookups. In addition, the logically sequential accesses during index creation would be transformed into random and redundant accesses to the physical chunks. Indeed, to the best of our knowledge, term indexing is not supported by any deduplicating storage system. In this article, we propose the design of a deduplication-aware term-index that addresses these challenges. IDEA maps terms to the unique chunks that contain them, and maps each chunk to the files in which it is contained. This basic design concept improves the index performance and can support advanced functionalities such as inline indexing, result ranking, and proximity search. Our prototype implementation based on Lucene (the search engine at the core of Elasticsearch) shows that IDEA can reduce the index size and indexing time by up to 73% and 94%, respectively, and reduce term-lookup latency by up to 82% and 59% for single and multi-term queries, respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 723f48c6-ea93-4682-b585-845b84a1c327Builds on5
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Pre-training via ParaphrasingMike Lewis, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Gargi Ghosh, Armen Aghajanyan et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 165 citations
- GoSeed: Generating an Optimal Seeding Plan for Deduplicated StorageAviv Nachman, Gala Yadgar, Sarai SheinvaldFAST 2020 · 19 citations
- The what, The from, and The to: The Migration Games in Deduplicated SystemsRoei Kisous, Ariel Kolikant, Abhinav Duggal, Sarai Sheinvald et al.FAST 2022 · 12 citations
- DedupSearch: Two-Phase Deduplication Aware Keyword SearchNadav Elias, Philip Shilane, Sarai Sheinvald, Gala YadgarFAST 2022 · 5 citations
Related papers
- FinerDedup: Sifting Fingerprints for Efficient Data Deduplication on Mobile DevicesXianzhang Chen, Xingjie Zhou, Wei Li, Xi Yu et al.DAC 2024 · 2 citations
- The Dilemma between Deduplication and Locality: Can Both be Achieved?Xiangyu Zou, Jingsong Yuan, Philip Shilane, Wen Xia et al.FAST 2021 · 45 citations
- Austere Flash Caching with Deduplication and CompressionQiuping Wang, Jinhong Li, Wen Xia, Erik Kruus et al.USENIX ATC 2020 · 26 citations
- IMPRESS: An Importance-Informed Multi-Tier Prefix KV Storage System for Large Language Model InferenceWeijian Chen, Shuibing He, Haoyang Qu, Ruidong Zhang et al.FAST 2025 · 40 citations
- Don't Maintain Twice, It's Alright: Merged Metadata Management in Deduplication File System with GogetaFSYanqi Pan, Wen Xia, Erci Xu, Hao Huang et al.FAST 2025 · 6 citations
