Write Your Own Code Checker: An Automated Test-Driven Checker Development Approach with LLMs
Jun Liu, Yuanyuan Xie, Jiwei Yan, Jinhao Huang, Jun Yan, Jian Zhang
Abstract
With the rising demand for code quality assurance, developers are not only utilizing existing static code checkers but also seeking custom checkers to satisfy their specific needs. Nowadays, various code-checking frameworks provide extensive checker customization interfaces to meet this need. However, both the abstract checking logic and the complex API usage of large-scale checker frameworks make this task challenging. To this end, automated code checker generation is anticipated to ease the burden of checker development. In this paper, we propose AutoChecker, an innovative LLM-powered approach that can write code checkers automatically based on only a rule description and a test suite. To achieve comprehensive checking logic, AutoChecker incrementally updates the checker's logic by focusing on solving one selected case each time. To obtain precise API knowledge, during each iteration, it leverages fine-grained logic-guided API-context retrieval, where it first decomposes the checking logic into a series of sub-operations and then retrieves checker-related API-contexts for each sub-operation. For evaluation, we apply AutoChecker, five baselines, and three ablation methods using multiple LLMs to generate checkers for 20 randomly selected PMD rules. Experimental results show that Au-toChecker significantly outperforms others across all effectiveness metrics, with an average test pass rate of 82.28%. Additionally, the checkers generated by AutoChecker can be successfully applied to real-world projects, matching the performance of official checkers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on15
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- ReACC: A Retrieval-Augmented Code Completion FrameworkShuai Lu, Nan Duan, Hojae Han, Daya Guo et al.ACL 2022 · 208 citations
- Repository-Level Prompt Generation for Large Language Models of CodeDisha Shrivastava, Hugo Larochelle, Daniel TarlowICML 2023 · 184 citations
Related papers
- Knowledge Matters: Injecting Project and Testing Knowledge into LLM-based Unit Test GenerationAnji Li, Mingwei Liu, Zhenxi Chen, Zheng Pei et al.ICSE 2026 · 2 citations
- LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLMYuxin Zhang, Yuxia Zhang, Zeyu Sun, Yanjie Jiang et al.ASE 2025 · 8 citations
- GraphCoder: Enhancing Repository-Level Code Completion via Coarse-to-fine Retrieval Based on Code Context GraphWei Liu, Ailun Yu, Daoguang Zan, Bo Shen et al.ASE 2024 · 11 citations
- Automated Unit Test RefactoringYi Gao, Xing Hu, Xiaohu Yang, Xin XiaFSE 2025 · 6 citations
- RTLFixer: Automatically Fixing RTL Syntax Errors with Large Language ModelYunda Tsai, Mingjie Liu, Haoxing RenDAC 2024 · 95 citations
