The Illusion of Competence: Evaluating the Effect of Explanations on Users' Mental Models of Visual Question Answering Systems
Judith Sieker, Simeon Junker, Ronja Utescher, Nazia Attari, Heiko Wersing, Hendrik Buschmeier, Sina Zarrieß
Abstract
We examine how users perceive the limitations of an AI system when it encounters a task that it cannot perform perfectly and whether providing explanations alongside its answers aids users in constructing an appropriate mental model of the system's capabilities and limitations. We employ a visual question answer and explanation task where we control the AI system's limitations by manipulating the visual inputs: during inference, the system either processes full-color or grayscale images. Our goal is to determine whether participants can perceive the limitations of the system. We hypothesize that explanations will make limited AI capabilities more transparent to users. However, our results show that explanations do not have this effect. Instead of allowing users to more accurately assess the limitations of the AI system, explanations generally increase users' perceptions of the system's competence -regardless of its actual performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Believing without Seeing: Quality Scores for Contextualizing Vision-Language Model ExplanationsKeyu He, Tejas Srinivasan, Brihi Joshi, Xiang Ren et al.ACL 2026
- Can LLMs Ground when they (Don't) Know: A Study on Direct and Loaded Political QuestionsClara Lachenmaier, Judith Sieker, Sina ZarrießACL 2025
- Measuring User's Mental Models of Speech Translation in Human-AI CollaborationHyojung Han, Nishant Balepur, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber, Marine CarpuatACL 2026
Builds on6
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
- Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 citations
- e-ViL: A Dataset and Benchmark for Natural Language Explanations in Vision-Language TasksMaxime Kayser, Oana-Maria Camburu, Leonard Salewski, Cornelius Emde et al.ICCV 2021 · 115 citations
- NLX-GPT: A Model for Natural Language Explanations in Vision and Vision-Language TasksFawaz Sammani, Tanmoy Mukherjee, Nikos DeligiannisCVPR 2022 · 46 citations
Related papers
- No Explainability without Accountability: An Empirical Study of Explanations and Feedback in Interactive MLAlison Smith-Renner, Ron Fan, Melissa Birchfield, Tongshuang Wu et al.CHI 2020 · 117 citations
- Does Explainable Artificial Intelligence Improve Human Decision-Making?Yasmeen Alufaisan, Laura R. Marusich, Jonathan Z. Bakdash, Yan Zhou et al.AAAI 2021 · 135 citations
- Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI BehaviorÁngel Alexander Cabrera, Adam Perer, Jason I. HongCSCW 2023 · 85 citations
- 'The AI is uncertain, so am I. What now?': Navigating Shortcomings of Uncertainty Representations in Human-AI Collaboration with Capability-focused GuidanceUlrike Schäfer, Lars Sipos, Claudia Müller-BirnCSCW 2025 · 6 citations
- Contrastive Explanations That Anticipate Human Misconceptions Can Improve Human Decision-Making SkillsZana Buçinca, Siddharth Swaroop, Amanda E. Paluch, Finale Doshi-Velez et al.CHI 2025 · 31 citations
