FuzzerAid: Grouping Fuzzed Crashes Based On Fault Signatures
Ashwin Kallingal Joshy, Wei Le
Abstract
Fuzzing has been an important approach for finding bugs and vulnerabilities in programs. Many fuzzers deployed in industry run daily and can generate an overwhelming number of crashes. Diagnosing such crashes can be very challenging and time-consuming. Existing fuzzers typically employ heuristics such as code coverage or call stack hashes to weed out duplicate reporting of bugs. While these heuristics are cheap, they are often imprecise and end up still reporting many "unique" crashes corresponding to the same bug. In this paper, we present FuzzerAid that uses fault signatures to group crashes reported by the fuzzers. Fault signature is a small executable program and consists of a selection of necessary statements from the original program that can reproduce a bug. In our approach, we first generate a fault signature using a given crash. We then execute the fault signature with other crash inducing inputs. If the failure is reproduced, we classify the crashes into the group labeled with the fault signature; if not, we generate a new fault signature. After all the crash inducing inputs are classified, we further merge the fault signatures of the same root cause into a group. We implemented our approach in a tool called FuzzerAid and evaluated it on 3020 crashes generated from 15 real-world bugs and 4 large open source projects. Our evaluation shows that we are able to correctly group 99.1% of the crashes and reported only 17 (+2) "unique" bugs, outperforming the state-of-the-art fuzzers. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Directed Greybox FuzzingMarcel Böhme, Van-Thuan Pham, Manh-Dung Nguyen, Abhik RoychoudhuryCCS 2017 · 836 citations
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei et al.CCS 2018 · 753 citations
- VUzzer: Application-aware Evolutionary FuzzingSanjay Rawat, Vivek Jain, Ashish Kumar, Lucian Cojocar et al.NDSS 2017 · 700 citations
- CollAFL: Path Sensitive FuzzingShuitao Gan, Chao Zhang, Xiaojun Qin, Xuwen Tu et al.S&P 2018 · 426 citations
- AURORA: Statistical Crash Analysis for Automated Root Cause ExplanationTim Blazytko, Moritz Schlögel, Cornelius Aschermann, Ali Abbasi et al.USENIX Security 2020
Related papers
- Igor: Crash Deduplication Through Root-Cause ClusteringZhiyuan Jiang, Xiyue Jiang, Ahmad Hazimeh, Chaojing Tang et al.CCS 2021 · 20 citations
- An In-depth Analysis of Duplicated Linux Kernel Bug ReportsDongliang Mu, Yuhang Wu, Yueqi Chen, Zhenpeng Lin et al.NDSS 2022
- BEACON: Directed Grey-Box Fuzzing with Provable Path PruningHeqing Huang, Yiyuan Guo, Qingkai Shi, Peisen Yao et al.S&P 2022 · 139 citations
- On the Reliability of Coverage-Based Fuzzer BenchmarkingMarcel Böhme, László Szekeres, Jonathan MetzmanICSE 2022 · 91 citations
- FIXREVERTER: A Realistic Bug Injection Methodology for Benchmarking Fuzz TestingZenong Zhang, Zach Patterson, Michael Hicks, Shiyi WeiUSENIX Security 2022
