Don't be so Monotone: Relaxing Stochastic Line Search in Over-Parameterized Models
Leonardo Galli, Holger Rauhut, Mark Schmidt
Abstract
Recent works have shown that line search methods can speed up Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and Adam in modern over-parameterized settings. However, existing line searches may take steps that are smaller than necessary since they require a monotone decrease of the (mini-)batch objective function. We explore nonmonotone line search methods to relax this condition and possibly accept larger step sizes. Despite the lack of a monotonic decrease, we prove the same fast rates of convergence as in the monotone case. Our experiments show that nonmonotone methods improve the speed of convergence and generalization properties of SGD/Adam even beyond the previous monotone line searches. We propose a POlyak NOnmonotone Stochastic (PoNoS) method, obtained by combining a nonmonotone line search with a Polyak initial step size. Furthermore, we develop a new resetting technique that in the majority of the iterations reduces the amount of backtracks to zero while still maintaining a large initial step size. To the best of our knowledge, a first runtime comparison shows that the epoch-wise advantage of line-search-based methods gets reflected in the overall computational time.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Adaptive SGD with Polyak stepsize and Line-search: Robust Convergence and Variance ReductionXiaowen Jiang, Sebastian U. StichNeurIPS 2023 · 40 citations
- Parameter-free Clipped Gradient Descent Meets PolyakYuki Takezawa, Han Bao, Ryoma Sato, Kenta Niwa et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- Stepping on the Edge: Curvature Aware Learning Rate TunersVincent Roulet, Atish Agarwala, Jean-Bastien Grill, Grzegorz Swirszcz et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Methods for Convex (L0, L1)-Smooth Optimization: Clipping, Acceleration, and AdaptivityEduard Gorbunov, Nazarii Tupitsa, Sayantan Choudhury, Alen Aliev et al.ICLR 2025
- Flatland: The Adventures of Gradient Descent with Large Step SizesLeonardo Galli, Curtis Fox, Wiebke Bartolomaeus, Mark Schmidt et al.ICML 2026
Builds on6
- Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?Jingzhao Zhang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Andreas Veit, Seungyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 397 citations
- Training Neural Networks for and by InterpolationLeonard Berrada, Andrew Zisserman, M. Pawan KumarICML 2020 · 71 citations
- Implicit Bias of the Step Size in Linear Diagonal Neural NetworksMor Shpigel Nacson, Kavya Ravichandran, Nathan Srebro, Daniel SoudryICML 2022 · 57 citations
- Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of StabilityJeremy Cohen, Simran Kaur, Yuanzhi Li, J. Zico Kolter et al.ICLR 2021 · 22 citations
- Parabolic Approximation Line Search for DNNsMaximus Mutschler, Andreas ZellNeurIPS 2020 · 22 citations
Related papers
- SGDA with shuffling: faster convergence for nonconvex-PŁ minimax optimizationHanseul Cho, Chulhee YunICLR 2023
- BiSLS/SPS: Auto-tune Step Sizes for Stable Bi-level OptimizationChen Fan, Gaspard Choné-Ducasse, Mark Schmidt, Christos ThrampoulidisNeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
- Adaptive backtracking line searchJoao V. Cavalcanti, Laurent Lessard, Ashia C. WilsonICLR 2025
- A Second look at Exponential and Cosine Step Sizes: Simplicity, Adaptivity, and PerformanceXiaoyu Li, Zhenxun Zhuang, Francesco OrabonaICML 2021 · 29 citations
- PAGE: A Simple and Optimal Probabilistic Gradient Estimator for Nonconvex OptimizationZhize Li, Hongyan Bao, Xiangliang Zhang, Peter RichtárikICML 2021 · 164 citations
