Can LLMs Find Fraudsters? Multi-level LLM Enhanced Graph Fraud Detection
Tairan Huang, Yili Wang, Qiutong Li, Changlong He, Jianliang Gao
Abstract
Graph fraud detection has garnered significant attention as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have proven effective in modeling complex relationships within multimodal data. However, existing graph fraud detection methods typically use preprocessed node embeddings and predefined graph structures to reveal fraudsters, which ignore the rich semantic cues contained in raw textual information. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit powerful capabilities in processing textual information, it remains a significant challenge to perform multimodal fusion of processed textual embeddings with graph structures. In this paper, we propose a Multi-level LLM Enhanced Graph Fraud Detection framework called MLED. In MLED, we utilize LLMs to extract external knowledge from textual information to enhance graph fraud detection methods. To integrate LLMs with graph structure information and enhance the ability to distinguish fraudsters, we design a multi-level LLM enhanced framework including type-level enhancer and relation-level enhancer. One is to enhance the difference between the fraudsters and the benign entities, the other is to enhance the importance of the fraudsters in different relations. The experiments on four real-world datasets show that MLED achieves state-of-the-art performance in graph fraud detection as a generalized framework that can be applied to existing methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 71b1bca0-eda7-4176-bd6e-4891afe2f7c5Cited by top-tier papers2
- Understanding Structured Financial Data with LLMs: A Case Study on Fraud DetectionXuwei Tan, Yao Ma, Xueru ZhangACL 2026 · 3 citations
- ROVER: Robust Generative Continual Identity Unlearning Against Relearning AttacksTairan Huang, Qiang Chen, Beibei Hu, Yunlong Zhao et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on23
- Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud DetectionYang Liu, Xiang Ao, Zidi Qin, Jianfeng Chi et al.WWW 2021 · 527 citations
- Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly DetectionJianheng Tang, Jiajin Li, Ziqi Gao, Jia LiICML 2022 · 365 citations
- GraphPrompt: Unifying Pre-Training and Downstream Tasks for Graph Neural NetworksZemin Liu, Xingtong Yu, Yuan Fang, Xinming ZhangWWW 2023 · 263 citations
- Addressing Heterophily in Graph Anomaly Detection: A Perspective of Graph SpectrumYuan Gao, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Zhenguang Liu et al.WWW 2023 · 189 citations
- Node Feature Extraction by Self-Supervised Multi-scale Neighborhood PredictionEli Chien, Wei-Cheng Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Hsiang-Fu Yu et al.ICLR 2022 · 185 citations
Related papers
- Targeting Borderline Fraudsters: Multi-View Hypergraph Fraud Detection with LLM-Guided Contrastive LearningRui Ou, Kun Zhu, Nana Zhang, Jiangtong Li et al.AAAI 2026
- DGP: A Dual-Granularity Prompting Framework for Fraud Detection with Graph-Enhanced LLMsYuan Li, Jun Hu, Bryan Hooi, Bingsheng He et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- Are LLM-Enhanced Graph Neural Networks Robust Against Poisoning Attacks?Yuhang Ma, Jie Wang, Zheng YanS&P 2026 · 4 citations
- Unlocking the Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models for Generalizable and Explainable Deepfake DetectionPeipeng Yu, Jianwei Fei, Hui Gao, Xuan Feng et al.ICML 2025
- Court of LLMs: Evidence-Augmented Generation via Multi-LLM Collaboration for Text-Attributed Graph Anomaly DetectionYiming Xu, Jiarun Chen, Zhen Peng, Zihan Chen et al.ACM MM 2025 · 3 citations
