XPrompt: Exploring the Extreme of Prompt Tuning
Fang Ma, Chen Zhang, Lei Ren, Jingang Wang, Qifan Wang, Wei Wu, Xiaojun Quan, Dawei Song
Abstract
Prompt tuning learns soft prompts to condition the frozen Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) for performing downstream tasks in a parameter-efficient manner. While prompt tuning has gradually reached the performance level of fine-tuning as the model scale increases, there is still a large performance gap between prompt tuning and fine-tuning for models of moderate and small scales (typically less than 11B parameters). In this paper, we empirically show that the trained prompt tokens can have a negative impact on a downstream task and thus degrade its performance. To bridge the gap, we propose a novel PROMPT tuning model with an eXtremely small scale (XPROMPT) under the regime of lottery tickets hypothesis. Specifically, XPROMPT eliminates the negative prompt tokens at different granularity levels through a hierarchical structured pruning, yielding a more parameter-efficient prompt yet with a competitive performance. Comprehensive experiments are carried out on the SuperGLUE tasks, and the results indicate that XPROMPT is able to close the performance gap at smaller model scales. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 715e747a-7672-4eac-be46-35be875b9a24Cited by top-tier papers15
- E2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt TuningCheng Han, Qifan Wang, Yiming Cui, Zhiwen Cao et al.ICCV 2023 · 108 citations
- Visual Fourier Prompt TuningRunjia Zeng, Cheng Han, Qifan Wang, Chunshu Wu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 58 citations
- Facing the Elephant in the Room: Visual Prompt Tuning or Full finetuning?Cheng Han, Qifan Wang, Yiming Cui, Wenguan Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 43 citations
- M²PT: Multimodal Prompt Tuning for Zero-shot Instruction LearningTaowen Wang, Yiyang Liu, James Liang, Junhan Zhao et al.EMNLP 2024 · 31 citations
- APrompt: Attention Prompt Tuning for Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Language ModelsQifan Wang, Yuning Mao, Jingang Wang, Hanchao Yu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 25 citations
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- SPoT: Better Frozen Model Adaptation through Soft Prompt TransferTu Vu, Brian Lester, Noah Constant, Rami Al-Rfou' et al.ACL 2022 · 332 citations
Related papers
- PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot LearningYuxian Gu, Xu Han, Zhiyuan Liu, Minlie HuangACL 2022
- The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt TuningBrian Lester, Rami Al-Rfou, Noah ConstantEMNLP 2021 · 94 citations
- ADePT: Adaptive Decomposed Prompt Tuning for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningPengwei Tang, Xiaolin Hu, Yong LiuICLR 2025
- Vector-Quantized Input-Contextualized Soft Prompts for Natural Language UnderstandingRishabh Bhardwaj, Amrita Saha, Steven C. H. Hoi, Soujanya PoriaEMNLP 2022 · 5 citations
- Gradient-Regulated Meta-Prompt Learning for Generalizable Vision-Language ModelsJuncheng Li, Minghe Gao, Longhui Wei, Siliang Tang et al.ICCV 2023 · 34 citations
