Disentangling Consensus and Value-Specific Representations for Controllable Pluralistic Value Alignment of LLMs
JianKui Zhou, Jing Yao, Xiaoyuan Yi, Peng Zhang, Ning Gu, Zhan Hu, Xing Xie, Tun Lu
Abstract
With the widespread deployment of large language models (LLMs), aligning model outputs with pluralistic human values has become an important research problem. Recent approaches that train task-specific experts and merge them through parameter aggregation have shown promise for pluralistic alignment. However, these methods often overlook the intrinsic complexity of real-world value data, where multiple correlated value dimensions coexist, resulting in highly similar and entangled expert representations. Consequently, modifying the contribution of one value expert may unintentionally influence other values, limiting fine-grained controllability. To address this issue, we propose DisAlign, a model-merging framework that explicitly decomposes value representations into consensus and value-specific components using an information-geometric perspective. DisAlign first extracts a consensus anchor and subspace to capture shared structure across values, and then applies spectral decomposition to the residual representations to construct disentangled value subspaces. This design enables more precise and independent modulation of multiple values. Experiments on three datasets covering different value frameworks demonstrate that DisAlign consistently improves value disentanglement and achieves more accurate pluralistic value control compared to existing baselines. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DisAlign-7F35
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 71485759-bb2a-4195-8fc0-7194d997f93fBuilds on25
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timeMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Rebecca Roelofs et al.ICML 2022 · 1,464 citations
- TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging ModelsPrateek Yadav, Derek Tam, Leshem Choshen, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 999 citations
Related papers
- Multi-Value Alignment for LLMs via Value Decorrelation and ExtrapolationHefei Xu, Le Wu, Chen Cheng, Hao LiuAAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM CollaborationShangbin Feng, Taylor Sorensen, Yuhan Liu, Jillian Fisher et al.EMNLP 2024 · 12 citations
- OrthAlign: Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Non-Interfering Multi-Objective AlignmentLiang Lin, Zhihao Xu, Junhao Dong, Jian Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- FGD-Align: Pluralistic Alignment for Large Language Models via Fuzzy Group Decision-MakingWeihang Pan, Zhengxu Yu, Yong Wu, Xun Liang et al.AAAI 2026
- Pluralistic Alignment for Healthcare: A Role-Driven FrameworkJiayou Zhong, Anudeex Shetty, Chao Jia, Xuanrui Lin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
