PREVis: Perceived Readability Evaluation for Visualizations
Anne-Flore Cabouat, Tingying He, Petra Isenberg, Tobias Isenberg
Abstract
We developed and validated an instrument to measure the perceived readability in data visualization: PREVis. Researchers and practitioners can easily use this instrument as part of their evaluations to compare the perceived readability of different visual data representations. Our instrument can complement results from controlled experiments on user task performance or provide additional data during in-depth qualitative work such as design iterations when developing a new technique. Although readability is recognized as an essential quality of data visualizations, so far there has not been a unified definition of the construct in the context of visual representations. As a result, researchers often lack guidance for determining how to ask people to rate their perceived readability of a visualization. To address this issue, we engaged in a rigorous process to develop the first validated instrument targeted at the subjective readability of visual data representations. Our final instrument consists of 11 items across 4 dimensions: understandability, layout clarity, readability of data values, and readability of data patterns. We provide the questionnaire as a document with implementation guidelines on osf.io/9cg8j. Beyond this instrument, we contribute a discussion of how researchers have previously assessed visualization readability, and an analysis of the factors underlying perceived readability in visual data representations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 713f21a3-481f-4c1e-b1bb-71e029bfdcd6Cited by top-tier papers5
- What Makes a Visualization Image Complex?Mengdi Chu, Zefeng Qiu, Meng Ling, Shuning Jiang et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 3 citations
- An Autoethnography on Visualization Literacy: A Wicked Measurement ProblemLily W. Ge, Anne-Flore Cabouat, Karen Bonilla, Yuan Cui et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 2 citations
- Write, Rank, or Rate: Comparing Methods for Studying Visualization AffordancesChase Stokes, Kylie R. Lin, Cindy Xiong BearfieldIEEE VIS 2025 · 2 citations
- Eye of the Beholder: Towards Measuring Visualization ComplexityJohannes Ellemose, Niklas ElmqvistIEEE VIS 2025 · 2 citations
- Reframing Pattern: A Comprehensive Approach to a Composite Visual VariableTingying He, Jason Dykes, Petra Isenberg, Tobias IsenbergIEEE VIS 2025
Builds on10
- Seeing What You Believe or Believing What You See? Belief Biases Correlation EstimationCindy Xiong, Chase Stokes, Yea-Seul Kim, Steven FranconeriIEEE VIS 2022 · 49 citations
- BeauVis: A Validated Scale for Measuring the Aesthetic Pleasure of Visual RepresentationsTingying He, Petra Isenberg, Raimund Dachselt, Tobias IsenbergIEEE VIS 2022 · 32 citations
- Vistrust: a Multidimensional Framework and Empirical Study of Trust in Data VisualizationsHamza Elhamdadi, Adam Stefkovics, Johanna Beyer, Eric Mörth et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 29 citations
- Adaptive Assessment of Visualization LiteracyYuan Cui, Lily W. Ge, Yiren Ding, Fumeng Yang et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 26 citations
- Professional Differences: A Comparative Study of Visualization Task Performance and Spatial Ability Across DisciplinesKyle Wm. Hall, Anthony Kouroupis, Anastasia Bezerianos, Danielle Albers Szafir et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 23 citations
Related papers
- reVISit: Looking Under the Hood of Interactive Visualization StudiesCarolina Nobre, Dylan Wootton, Zach Cutler, Lane Harrison et al.CHI 2021 · 20 citations
- A Multiliteracy Model for Interactive Visualization Literacy: Definitions, Literacies, and Steps for Future ResearchGabriela Molina León, Benjamin Bach, Matheus Valentim, Niklas ElmqvistCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Exploring Chart Question Answering for Blind and Low Vision UsersJiho Kim, Arjun Srinivasan, Nam Wook Kim, Yea-Seul KimCHI 2023 · 33 citations
- Who Do We Mean When We Talk About Visualization Novices?Alyxander Burns, Christiana Lee, Ria Chawla, Evan Peck et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
- Chart Reader: Accessible Visualization Experiences Designed with Screen Reader UsersJohn R. Thompson, Jesse J. Martinez, Alper Sarikaya, Edward Cutrell et al.CHI 2023 · 43 citations
