Spooky: Granulating LSM-Tree Compactions Correctly
Niv Dayan, Tamar Weiss, Shmuel Dashevsky, Michael Pan, Edward Bortnikov, Moshe Twitto
Abstract
Modern storage engines and key-value stores have come to rely on the log-structured merge-tree (LSM-tree) as their core data structure. LSM-tree operates by gradually merge-sorting data across levels of exponentially increasing capacities in storage. A crucial design dimension of LSM-tree is its compaction granularity. Some designs perform Full Merge, whereby entire levels get compacted at once. Others perform Partial Merge, whereby smaller groups of files with overlapping key ranges are compacted independently. This paper shows that both strategies exhibit serious flaws. With Full Merge, space-amplification is exorbitant. The reason is that while compacting the LSM-tree's largest level, there must be at least twice as much storage space as data to store both the original and new files until the compaction is finished. On the other hand, Partial Merge exhibits excessive write-amplification. The reason is twofold. (1) The files getting compacted typically do not have perfectly overlapping key ranges, and so some non-overlapping data is superfluously rewritten in each compaction. (2) Files with different lifetimes become interspersed within the SSD leading to high SSD garbage-collection overheads. As the data size grows, these problems grow in magnitude. We introduce Spooky, a novel compaction granulation method to address these problems. Spooky partitions data at the largest level into equally sized files, and it partitions data at smaller levels based on the file boundaries at the largest level. This allows merging one group of perfectly overlapping files at a time to limit spaceamplification and compaction overheads. At the same time, Spooky writes larger though fewer files simultaneously so that files with different lifetimes do not become as interspersed within the SSD. This cheapens garbage-collection. We show empirically that Spooky achieves >2x lower space-amplification than Full Merge and >2x lower write-amplification than Partial Merge at the same time.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 712c31ce-a0dc-466d-ad3a-4cf4ed065cdbCited by top-tier papers20
- Learning to Optimize LSM-trees: Towards A Reinforcement Learning based Key-Value Store for Dynamic WorkloadsDingheng Mo, Fanchao Chen, Siqiang Luo, Caihua ShanSIGMOD 2024 · 26 citations
- COLE: A Column-based Learned Storage for Blockchain SystemsCe Zhang, Cheng Xu, Haibo Hu, Jianliang XuFAST 2024 · 20 citations
- CaaS-LSM: Compaction-as-a-Service for LSM-based Key-Value Stores in Storage Disaggregated InfrastructureQiaolin Yu, Chang Guo, Jay Zhuang, Viraj Thakkar et al.SIGMOD 2024 · 18 citations
- GRF: A Global Range Filter for LSM-Trees with Shape EncodingHengrui Wang, Te Guo, Junzhao Yang, Huanchen ZhangSIGMOD 2024 · 15 citations
- CAMAL: Optimizing LSM-trees via Active LearningWeiping Yu, Siqiang Luo, Zihao Yu, Gao CongSIGMOD 2025 · 11 citations
Builds on13
- ZNS: Avoiding the Block Interface Tax for Flash-based SSDsMatias Bjørling, Abutalib Aghayev, Hans Holmberg, Aravind Ramesh et al.USENIX ATC 2021 · 221 citations
- MatrixKV: Reducing Write Stalls and Write Amplification in LSM-tree Based KV Stores with Matrix Container in NVMTing Yao, Yiwen Zhang, Jiguang Wan, Qiu Cui et al.USENIX ATC 2020 · 186 citations
- From WiscKey to Bourbon: A Learned Index for Log-Structured Merge TreesYifan Dai, Yien Xu, Aishwarya Ganesan, Ramnatthan Alagappan et al.OSDI 2020 · 138 citations
- Evolution of Development Priorities in Key-value Stores Serving Large-scale Applications: The RocksDB ExperienceSiying Dong, Andrew Kryczka, Yanqin Jin, Michael StummFAST 2021 · 110 citations
- FPGA-Accelerated Compactions for LSM-based Key-Value StoreTeng Zhang, Jianying Wang, Xuntao Cheng, Hao Xu et al.FAST 2020 · 99 citations
Related papers
- Reducing Write Amplification of LSM-Tree with Block-Grained CompactionXiaoliang Wang, Peiquan Jin, Bei Hua, Hai Long et al.ICDE 2022 · 26 citations
- Scavenger: Better Space-Time Trade-Offs for Key-Value Separated LSM-treesJianshun Zhang, Fang Wang, Sheng Qiu, Yi Wang et al.ICDE 2024 · 5 citations
- Constructing and Analyzing the LSM Compaction Design SpaceSubhadeep Sarkar, Dimitris Staratzis, Zichen Zhu, Manos AthanassoulisVLDB 2021 · 73 citations
- gParaKV: A GPGPU-accelerated Key-Value Separation-based KV Store with Optimized Compaction and Garbage CollectionHui Sun, Xiangxiang Jiang, Xiao Qin, Song Jiang et al.SC 2025 · 3 citations
- PartitionKV: Redesigning LSM-tree KV Stores on NVMs with Adaptive Partitioning for Reducing Write Stalls and AmplificationXingye Huang, Jinyu Wu, Xiaofang Xia, Jiangtao Cui et al.SIGMOD 2026
