CorrSteer: Generation-Time LLM Steering via Correlated Sparse Autoencoder Features
Seonglae Cho, Zekun Wu, Adriano Koshiyama
Abstract
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) decompose LLM activations into interpretable features, yet existing SAE-based steering methods require contrastive datasets or large activation stores. We introduce CorrSteer, which selects steering features by correlating task outcomes with SAE activations computed during generation, then validates these selections through intervention. This two-stage approach treats correlation as a selection heuristic and intervention as the causal test: features that both correlate with success and improve performance when amplified are retained. Coefficients derive from mean activations on correct samples, yielding a fully automated pipeline without task-specific tuning. On Gemma-2 2B and LLaMA-3.1 8B, CorrSteer achieves +3.3% on MMLU (4k samples) and +27.1% on HarmBench (108 samples), with lower side-effect ratios than fine-tuning despite comparable accuracy. Selected features cluster into interpretable categories: structured-output features for multiple-choice tasks, refusal features for safety, and domain-specific semantics for specialized benchmarks. The method scales to SAE features (16K per layer × 26 layers for Gemma-2 2B; 32K × 32 for LLaMA-3.1 8B) via streaming correlation ( in dataset size), requiring no backward passes or activation storage.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 70bc82ed-11ad-426c-8467-774fb20d4e4cBuilds on11
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic InterpretabilityArthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch, Stefan Heimersheim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 861 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
Related papers
- Does Higher Interpretability Imply Better Utility? A Pairwise Analysis on Sparse AutoencodersXu Wang, Yan Hu, Benyou Wang, Difan ZouICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Language Models Can Explain Visual Features via SteeringJavier Ferrando, Enrique Lopez-Cuena, Pablo Agustin Martin-Torres, Daniel Hinjos et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Endogenous Resistance to Activation Steering in Language ModelsAlex McKenzie, Keenan Pepper, Stijn Servaes, Martin Leitgab et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Breaking Bad Tokens: Detoxification of LLMs Using Sparse AutoencodersAgam Goyal, Vedant Rathi, William Yeh, Yian Wang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse AutoencodersAkshay Kulkarni, Tsui-Wei Weng, Vivek Narayanaswamy, Shusen Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
