Medusa: Cross-Modal Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Multimodal Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Yingjia Shang, Yi Liu, Huimin Wang, Furong Li, Wenfang Sun, Chengyu Wu, Yefeng Zheng
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of retrieval-augmented visionlanguage models, multimodal medical retrieval-augmented generation (MMed-RAG) systems are increasingly adopted in clinical decision support. These systems enhance medical applications by performing cross-modal retrieval to integrate relevant visual and textual evidence for tasks, e.g., report generation and disease diagnosis. However, their complex architecture also introduces underexplored adversarial vulnerabilities, particularly via visual input perturbations. In this paper, we propose Medusa, a novel framework for crafting cross-modal transferable adversarial attacks on MMed-RAG systems under a black-box setting. Specifically, Medusa formulates the attack as a perturbation optimization problem, leveraging a multi-positive InfoNCE loss (MPIL) to align adversarial visual embeddings with medically plausible but malicious textual targets, thereby hijacking the retrieval process. To enhance transferability, we adopt a surrogate model ensemble and design a dual-loop optimization strategy augmented with invariant risk minimization (IRM). Extensive experiments on two real-world medical tasks, including medical report generation and disease diagnosis, demonstrate that Medusa achieves over 90% average attack success rate across various generation models and retrievers under appropriate parameter configuration, while remaining robust against four mainstream defenses, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines. Our results reveal critical vulnerabilities in the MMed-RAG systems and highlight the necessity of robustness benchmarking in safetycritical medical applications. The code and data are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MMed-RAG-Attack-F05A .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the HypersphereTongzhou Wang, Phillip IsolaICML 2020 · 2,360 citations
- Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural NetworksWeilin Xu, David Evans, Yanjun QiNDSS 2018 · 1,633 citations
- MedCLIP: Contrastive Learning from Unpaired Medical Images and TextZifeng Wang, Zhenbang Wu, Dinesh Agarwal, Jimeng SunEMNLP 2022 · 907 citations
Related papers
- On the Vulnerability of Applying Retrieval-Augmented Generation within Knowledge-Intensive Application DomainsXun Xian, Ganghua Wang, Xuan Bi, Rui Zhang et al.ICML 2025
- When Background Matters: Breaking Medical Vision Language Models by Transferable AttackAkash Ghosh, Subhadip Baidya, Sriparna Saha, Xiuying ChenACL 2026
- IRAG: Robust Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Hazard SeparationRuikun Luo, Zixiao Feng, Lin Gu, Xiaoyu XiaWWW 2026
- MIRA: A Novel Framework for Fusing Modalities in Medical RAGJinhong Wang, Tajamul Ashraf, Zongyan Han, Jorma Laaksonen et al.ACM MM 2025 · 5 citations
- Beyond Text: Unveiling Privacy Vulnerabilities in Multi-modal Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJiankun Zhang, Shenglai Zeng, Jie Ren, Tianqi Zheng et al.EMNLP 2025
