Graph Defense Diffusion Model
Xin He, Wenqi Fan, Yili Wang, Chengyi Liu, Rui Miao, Xin Juan, Xin Wang
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which can greatly degrade their performance. Existing graph purification methods attempt to address this issue by filtering attacked graphs. However, they struggle to defend effectively against multiple types of adversarial attacks (e.g., targeted attacks and non-targeted attacks) simultaneously due to limited flexibility. Additionally, these methods lack comprehensive modeling of graph data, relying heavily on heuristic prior knowledge. To overcome these challenges, we introduce the Graph Defense Diffusion Model (GDDM), a flexible purification method that leverages the denoising and modeling capabilities of diffusion models. The iterative nature of diffusion models aligns well with the stepwise process of adversarial attacks, making them particularly suitable for defense. By iteratively adding and removing noises (edges), GDDM effectively purifies attacked graphs, restoring their original structures and features. Our GDDM consists of two key components: (1) Graph Structure-Driven Refiner, which preserves the basic fidelity of the graph during the denoising process, and ensures that the generated graph remains consistent with the original scope; and (2) Node Feature-Constrained Regularizer, which removes residual impurities from the denoised graph, further enhancing the purification effect. By designing tailored denoising strategies to handle different types of adversarial attacks, we improve the GDDM's adaptability to various attack scenarios. Furthermore, GDDM demonstrates strong scalability, leveraging its structural properties to seamlessly transfer across similar datasets without retraining. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that GDDM outperforms state-of-the-art methods in defending against various adversarial attacks, showcasing its robustness and effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 701d6070-56d4-48fa-b99f-6ce9c7364f8cBuilds on22
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Scalable Diffusion Models with TransformersWilliam Peebles, Saining XieICCV 2023 · 5,568 citations
- Graph Structure Learning for Robust Graph Neural NetworksWei Jin, Yao Ma, Xiaorui Liu, Xianfeng Tang et al.KDD 2020 · 604 citations
- GNNGuard: Defending Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial AttacksXiang Zhang, Marinka ZitnikNeurIPS 2020 · 416 citations
- DiffIR: Efficient Diffusion Model for Image RestorationBin Xia, Yulun Zhang, Shiyin Wang, Yitong Wang et al.ICCV 2023 · 410 citations
Related papers
- Robust Graph Learning Against Adversarial Evasion Attacks via Prior-Free Diffusion-Based Structure PurificationJiayi Luo, Qingyun Sun, Haonan Yuan, Xingcheng Fu et al.WWW 2025 · 7 citations
- Adversarial Training for Graph Neural Networks: Pitfalls, Solutions, and New DirectionsLukas Gosch, Simon Geisler, Daniel Sturm, Bertrand Charpentier et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
- Self-supervised Adversarial Purification for Graph Neural NetworksWoohyun Lee, Hogun ParkICML 2025
- ADBM: Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model for Reliable Adversarial PurificationXiao Li, Wenxuan Sun, Huanran Chen, Qiongxiu Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Diffusion Models for Adversarial PurificationWeili Nie, Brandon Guo, Yujia Huang, Chaowei Xiao et al.ICML 2022 · 663 citations
