Anomaly Detection in the Open World: Normality Shift Detection, Explanation, and Adaptation
Dongqi Han, Zhiliang Wang, Wenqi Chen, Kai Wang, Rui Yu, Su Wang, Han Zhang, Zhihua Wang, Minghui Jin, Jiahai Yang, Xingang Shi, Xia Yin
Abstract
Concept drift is one of the most frustrating challenges for learning-based security applications built on the closeworld assumption of identical distribution between training and deployment. Anomaly detection, one of the most important tasks in security domains, is instead immune to the drift of abnormal behavior due to the training without any abnormal data (known as zero-positive), which however comes at the cost of more severe impacts when normality shifts. However, existing studies mainly focus on concept drift of abnormal behaviour and/or supervised learning, leaving the normality shift for zero-positive anomaly detection largely unexplored.
In this work, we are the first to explore the normality shift for deep learning-based anomaly detection in security applications, and propose OWAD, a general framework to detect, explain, and adapt to normality shift in practice. In particular, OWAD outperforms prior work by detecting shift in an unsupervised fashion, reducing the overhead of manual labeling, and providing better adaptation performance through distribution-level tackling. We demonstrate the effectiveness of OWAD through several realistic experiments on three security-related anomaly detection applications with long-term practical data. Results show that OWAD can provide better adaptation performance of normality shift with less labeling overhead. We provide case studies to analyze the normality shift and provide operational recommendations for security applications. We also conduct an initial real-world deployment on a SCADA security system.
1 Normality shift intuitively refers to the change of distribution of normal data (detailed definition is in §II-C). In this paper, we interchangeably use terms "drift" and "shift". We tend to use "normality shift" as a whole term.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6fb94491-964f-4f37-9589-b08dd05afa43Cited by top-tier papers20
- AOC-IDS: Autonomous Online Framework with Contrastive Learning for Intrusion DetectionXinchen Zhang, Running Zhao, Zhihan Jiang, Zhicong Sun et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 27 citations
- Continual Learning with Strategic Selection and Forgetting for Network Intrusion DetectionXinchen Zhang, Running Zhao, Zhihan Jiang, Handi Chen et al.INFOCOM 2025 · 26 citations
- Understanding and Bridging the Gap Between Unsupervised Network Representation Learning and Security AnalyticsJiacen Xu, Xiaokui Shu, Zhou LiS&P 2024 · 14 citations
- Enhancing Network Attack Detection with Distributed and In-Network Data Collection SystemSeyed Mohammad Mehdi Mirnajafizadeh, Ashwin Raam Sethuram, David Mohaisen, DaeHun Nyang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 12 citations
- Facing Anomalies Head-On: Network Traffic Anomaly Detection via Uncertainty-Inspired Inter-Sample DifferencesXinglin Lian, Chengtai Cao, Yan Liu, Xovee Xu et al.WWW 2025 · 11 citations
Builds on19
- DeepLog: Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis from System Logs through Deep LearningMin Du, Feifei Li, Guineng Zheng, Vivek SrikumarCCS 2017 · 1,823 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion DetectionYisroel Mirsky, Tomer Doitshman, Yuval Elovici, Asaf ShabtaiNDSS 2018 · 945 citations
- MaMaDroid: Detecting Android Malware by Building Markov Chains of Behavioral ModelsEnrico Mariconti, Lucky Onwuzurike, Panagiotis Andriotis, Emiliano De Cristofaro et al.NDSS 2017 · 471 citations
- TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and TimeFeargus Pendlebury, Fabio Pierazzi, Roberto Jordaney, Johannes Kinder et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 441 citations
Related papers
- DeepAID: Interpreting and Improving Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Security ApplicationsDongqi Han, Zhiliang Wang, Wenqi Chen, Ying Zhong et al.CCS 2021 · 108 citations
- CAShift: Benchmarking Log-Based Cloud Attack Detection under Normality ShiftJiongchi Yu, Xiaofei Xie, Qiang Hu, Bowen Zhang et al.FSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection via Batch NormalizationAodong Li, Chen Qiu, Marius Kloft, Padhraic Smyth et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Lifelong Anomaly Detection Through UnlearningMin Du, Zhi Chen, Chang Liu, Rajvardhan Oak et al.CCS 2019 · 145 citations
- Anomaly Detection under Distribution ShiftTri Cao, Jiawen Zhu, Guansong PangICCV 2023 · 54 citations
