RATIONALYST: Pre-training Process-Supervision for Improving Reasoning
Dongwei Jiang, Guoxuan Wang, Yining Lu, Andrew Wang, Jingyu Zhang, Chuyu Liu, Benjamin Van Durme, Daniel Khashabi
Abstract
The reasoning steps generated by LLMs might be incomplete, as they mimic logical leaps common in everyday communication found in their pre-training data: underlying rationales are frequently left implicit (unstated). To address this challenge, we introduce RATIONALYST, a model for process-supervision of reasoning based on pre-training on a vast collection of rationale annotations extracted from unlabeled data. We extract 79k rationales from web-scale unlabelled dataset (the Pile) and a combination of reasoning datasets with minimal human intervention. This web-scale pre-training for reasoning allows RATIONALYST to consistently generalize across diverse reasoning tasks, including mathematical, commonsense, scientific, and logical reasoning. Fine-tuned from LLaMa-3-8B-Instruct, RATIONALYST improves the accuracy of reasoning by an average of 3.9% on 7 representative reasoning benchmarks. It also demonstrates superior performance compared to significantly larger verifiers like GPT-4 and similarly sized models fine-tuned on matching training sets. 1 … After losing 23 on Tuesday, he had 58 -23 = 35 golf balls. After losing 23 on Tuesday and Wednesday, he had 58 -23 = 35 golf balls.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Quasi-Symbolic AbstractionsLeonardo Ranaldi, Marco Valentino, André FreitasACL 2025 · 29 citations
- Short Chains, Deep Thoughts: Balancing Reasoning Efficiency and Intra-Segment Capability via Split-Merge OptimizationRunquan Gui, Jie Wang, Zhihai Wang, Chi Ma et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- CoMAT: Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought Improves Mathematical ReasoningJoshua Ong Jun Leang, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Shay B. CohenEMNLP 2025
Builds on14
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
Related papers
- Chain of Execution Supervision Promotes General Reasoning in Large Language ModelsNuo Chen, Zehua Li, Keqin Bao, Junyang Lin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning ModelsKe Ji, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Qiuzhi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 33 citations
- AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised VerifierJianqiao Lu, Zhiyang Dou, Hongru Wang, Zeyu Cao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 35 citations
- Large Language Models Can Self-ImproveJiaxin Huang, Shixiang Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 184 citations
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations
