SmartDagger: a bytecode-based static analysis approach for detecting cross-contract vulnerability
Zeqin Liao, Zibin Zheng, Xiao Chen, Yuhong Nan
Abstract
With the increasing popularity of blockchain, automatically detecting vulnerabilities in smart contracts is becoming a significant problem. Prior research mainly identifies smart contract vulnerabilities without considering the interactions between multiple contracts. Due to the lack of analyzing the fine-grained contextual information during cross-contract invocations, existing approaches often produced a large number of false positives and false negatives. This paper proposes SmartDagger, a new framework for detecting cross-contract vulnerability through static analysis at the bytecode level. SmartDagger integrates a set of novel mechanisms to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency for cross-contract vulnerability detection. Particularly, SmartDagger effectively recovers the contract attribute information from the smart contract bytecode, which is critical for accurately identifying cross-contract vulnerabilities. Besides, instead of performing the typical whole-program analysis which is heavy-weight and time-consuming, SmartDagger selectively analyzes a subset of functions and reuses the data-flow results, which helps to improve its efficiency. Our further evaluation over a manually labelled dataset showed that SmartDagger significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art tools (i.e., Oyente, Slither, Osiris, and Mythril) for detecting cross-contract vulnerabilities. In addition, running SmartDagger over a randomly selected dataset of 250 smart contracts in the real-world, SmartDagger detects 11 cross-contract vulnerabilities, all of which are missed by prior tools.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 6f7862f2-37c8-4e6d-a9c7-768e4babd65fCited by top-tier papers12
- Efficiently Detecting Reentrancy Vulnerabilities in Complex Smart ContractsZexu Wang, Jiachi Chen, Yanlin Wang, Yu Zhang et al.FSE 2024 · 27 citations
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools for Smart Contracts: How Far Are We?Kaixuan Li, Yue Xue, Sen Chen, Han Liu et al.FSE 2024 · 26 citations
- Uncover the Premeditated Attacks: Detecting Exploitable Reentrancy Vulnerabilities by Identifying Attacker ContractsShuo Yang, Jiachi Chen, Mingyuan Huang, Zibin Zheng et al.ICSE 2024 · 24 citations
- SmartState: Detecting State-Reverting Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts via Fine-Grained State-Dependency AnalysisZeqin Liao, Sicheng Hao, Yuhong Nan, Zibin ZhengISSTA 2023 · 22 citations
- SmartAxe: Detecting Cross-Chain Vulnerabilities in Bridge Smart Contracts via Fine-Grained Static AnalysisZeqin Liao, Yuhong Nan, Henglong Liang, Sicheng Hao et al.FSE 2024 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Cross-Contract Static Analysis for Detecting Practical Reentrancy Vulnerabilities in Smart ContractsYinxing Xue, Mingliang Ma, Yun Lin, Yulei Sui et al.ASE 2020 · 77 citations
- SCVHunter: Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Based on Heterogeneous Graph Attention NetworkFeng Luo, Ruijie Luo, Ting Chen, Ao Qiao et al.ICSE 2024 · 38 citations
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 373 citations
- How effective are smart contract analysis tools? evaluating smart contract static analysis tools using bug injectionAsem Ghaleb, Karthik PattabiramanISSTA 2020 · 183 citations
- Turn the Rudder: A Beacon of Reentrancy Detection for Smart Contracts on EthereumZibin Zheng, Neng Zhang, Jianzhong Su, Zhijie Zhong et al.ICSE 2023 · 52 citations
