Generalization through variance: how noise shapes inductive biases in diffusion models
John J. Vastola
Abstract
How diffusion models generalize beyond their training set is not known, and is somewhat mysterious given two facts: the optimum of the denoising score matching (DSM) objective usually used to train diffusion models is the score function of the training distribution; and the networks usually used to learn the score function are expressive enough to learn this score to high accuracy. We claim that a certain feature of the DSM objective-the fact that its target is not the training distribution's score, but a noisy quantity only equal to it in expectation-strongly impacts whether and to what extent diffusion models generalize. In this paper, we develop a mathematical theory that partly explains this 'generalization through variance' phenomenon. Our theoretical analysis exploits a physics-inspired path integral approach to compute the distributions typically learned by a few paradigmatic underand overparameterized diffusion models. We find that the distributions diffusion models effectively learn to sample from resemble their training distributions, but with 'gaps' filled in, and that this inductive bias is due to the covariance structure of the noisy target used during training. We also characterize how this inductive bias interacts with feature-related inductive biases.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6f596c72-87fb-4df1-a242-190ce62b39b6Cited by top-tier papers8
- On the Closed-Form of Flow Matching: Generalization Does Not Arise from Target StochasticityQuentin Bertrand, Anne Gagneux, Mathurin Massias, Rémi EmonetNeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
- On the Edge of Memorization in Diffusion ModelsSam Buchanan, Druv Pai, Yi Ma, Valentin De BortoliNeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- UALM: Unified Audio Language Model for Understanding, Generation and ReasoningJinchuan Tian, Sang-gil Lee, Zhifeng Kong, Sreyan Ghosh et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Provable Separations between Memorization and Generalization in Diffusion ModelsZeqi Ye, Qijie Zhu, Molei Tao, Minshuo ChenICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- A Random Matrix Perspective on the Consistency of Diffusion ModelsBinxu Wang, Jacob A Zavatone-Veth, Cengiz PehlevanICML 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on29
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative ModelsTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, Samuli LaineNeurIPS 2022 · 3,959 citations
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
- Pseudo Numerical Methods for Diffusion Models on ManifoldsLuping Liu, Yi Ren, Zhijie Lin, Zhou ZhaoICLR 2022 · 861 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Generalizability of Diffusion Models Requires Rethinking the Hidden Gaussian StructureXiang Li, Yixiang Dai, Qing QuNeurIPS 2024 · 45 citations
- What's the score? Automated Denoising Score Matching for Nonlinear DiffusionsRaghav Singhal, Mark Goldstein, Rajesh RanganathICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Denoising Diffusion SamplersFrancisco Vargas, Will Sussman Grathwohl, Arnaud DoucetICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Towards a Mechanistic Explanation of Diffusion Model GeneralizationMatthew Niedoba, Berend Zwartsenberg, Kevin Patrick Murphy, Frank WoodICML 2025
- Evaluating the design space of diffusion-based generative modelsYuqing Wang, Ye He, Molei TaoNeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations
