Equilibrium Policy Generalization: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Cross-Graph Zero-Shot Generalization in Pursuit-Evasion Games
Runyu Lu, Peng Zhang, Ruochuan Shi, Yuanheng Zhu, Dongbin Zhao, Yang Liu, Dong Wang, Cesare Alippi
Abstract
Equilibrium learning in adversarial games is an important topic widely examined in the fields of game theory and reinforcement learning (RL). Pursuit-evasion game (PEG), as an important class of real-world games from the fields of robotics and security, requires exponential time to be accurately solved. When the underlying graph structure varies, even the state-of-the-art RL methods require recomputation or at least fine-tuning, which can be time-consuming and impair real-time applicability. This paper proposes an Equilibrium Policy Generalization (EPG) framework to effectively learn a generalized policy with robust cross-graph zero-shot performance. In the context of PEGs, our framework is generally applicable to both pursuer and evader sides in both no-exit and multi-exit scenarios. These two generalizability properties, to our knowledge, are the first to appear in this domain. The core idea of the EPG framework is to train an RL policy across different graph structures against the equilibrium policy for each single graph. To construct an equilibrium oracle for single-graph policies, we present a dynamic programming (DP) algorithm that provably generates pure-strategy Nash equilibrium with near-optimal time complexity. To guarantee scalability with respect to pursuer number, we further extend DP and RL by designing a grouping mechanism and a sequence model for joint policy decomposition, respectively. Experimental results show that, using equilibrium guidance and a distance feature proposed for cross-graph PEG training, the EPG framework guarantees desirable zero-shot performance in various unseen real-world graphs. Besides, when trained under an equilibrium heuristic proposed for the graphs with exits, our generalized pursuer policy can even match the performance of the fine-tuned policies from the state-of-the-art PEG methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Saliency-Guided Representation with Consistency Policy Learning for Visual Unsupervised Reinforcement LearningJingbo Sun, Qichao Zhang, Songjun Tu, Xing Fang et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- R2PS: Worst-Case Robust Real-Time Pursuit Strategies under Partial ObservabilityRunyu Lu, Ruochuan Shi, Yuanheng Zhu, Dongbin ZhaoICLR 2026
Builds on9
- GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph AutoencodersZhenyu Hou, Xiao Liu, Yukuo Cen, Yuxiao Dong et al.KDD 2022 · 533 citations
- Real World Games Look Like Spinning TopsWojciech M. Czarnecki, Gauthier Gidel, Brendan D. Tracey, Karl Tuyls et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 123 citations
- Empowering Multi-Robot Cooperation via Sequential World ModelsZijie Zhao, Honglei Guo, Shengqian Chen, Kaixuan Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Solving Large-Scale Pursuit-Evasion Games Using Pre-trained StrategiesShuxin Li, Xinrun Wang, Youzhi Zhang, Wanqi Xue et al.AAAI 2023 · 15 citations
- NSGZero: Efficiently Learning Non-exploitable Policy in Large-Scale Network Security Games with Neural Monte Carlo Tree SearchWanqi Xue, Bo An, Chai Kiat YeoAAAI 2022 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Constrained Exploitability Descent: An Offline Reinforcement Learning Method for Finding Mixed-Strategy Nash EquilibriumRunyu Lu, Yuanheng Zhu, Dongbin ZhaoICML 2025
- The Power of Exploiter: Provable Multi-Agent RL in Large State SpacesChi Jin, Qinghua Liu, Tiancheng YuICML 2022 · 59 citations
- Turbocharging Solution Concepts: Solving NEs, CEs and CCEs with Neural Equilibrium SolversLuke Marris, Ian Gemp, Thomas Anthony, Andrea Tacchetti et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- PEARL: Zero-shot Cross-task Preference Alignment and Robust Reward Learning for Robotic ManipulationRunze Liu, Yali Du, Fengshuo Bai, Jiafei Lyu et al.ICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Learning Not to RegretDavid Sychrovsky, Michal Sustr, Elnaz Davoodi, Michael Bowling et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
