Hierarchical Residual Policy Optimization for Generative Recommendations
Kaifeng Guo, Yiming Yang, Jingtong Gao, Guolei Zeng, Fukang Yang, Yukang Liang, Peng Jiang, Qingpeng Cai, Xiangyu Zhao
Abstract
Generative recommenders select items by autoregressively decoding semantic identifiers (SIDs), whose token positions induce a coarse-to-fine hierarchy over the item space. In practice, SID decoders are trained via supervised next-token prediction, which imitates logged trajectories rather than directly optimizing downstream utility. This motivates post-training with outcome feedback to guide decoding toward higher utility. However, logged feedback is only observed for the final exposed item, causing most posttraining methods to operate at the item level and broadcast the same terminal signal across all SID tokens. As a result, token-level credit assignment becomes sparse, high-variance, and layer-dependent. To this end, we propose Hierarchical Residual Policy Optimization (HRPO), a post-training framework that converts item-level outcomes into dense, token-aligned learning signals for conservative token-wise improvement. Specifically, HRPO first estimates SID prefix-level utilities via group-wise reward smoothing over featurebased user clusters. It then decomposes these utilities into residual token credits and accumulates them into credit-to-go signals. Finally, Residual-Return Policy Optimization (RRPO) optimizes the residual credits using clipped updates, group-normalized advantages, and KL regularization to preserve stability. Experiments on a public dataset and an online A/B test in a large-scale commercial system show consistent gains in session-level utility and key business metrics. Source code and the archived artifact are available for reproduction 1 . * This work was done during Kaifeng Guo's internship at Kuaishou Technology.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on11
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search IndexYi Tay, Vinh Tran, Mostafa Dehghani, Jianmo Ni et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 506 citations
- Recommender Systems with Generative RetrievalShashank Rajput, Nikhil Mehta, Anima Singh, Raghunandan Hulikal Keshavan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 474 citations
Related papers
- APAO: Bridging the Training-Inference Gap in Generative Recommendation via Adaptive Prefix-Aware OptimizationYuanqing Yu, Yifan Wang, Weizhi Ma, Zhiqiang Guo et al.KDD 2026 · 4 citations
- LLM-Aligned Geographic Item Tokenization for Local-Life RecommendationHao Jiang, Guoquan Wang, Donglin Zhou, Sheng Yu et al.AAAI 2026
- Revisiting Fairness-aware Interactive Recommendation: Item Lifecycle as a Control KnobYun Lu, Xiaoyu Shi, Hong Xie, Chongjun Xia et al.AAAI 2026
- Principled RL for Flow Matching Emerges from the Chunk-level Policy OptimizationYifu Luo, Haoyuan Sun, Xinhao Hu, Penghui Du et al.ICML 2026 · 12 citations
- S2GR: Stepwise Semantic-Guided Reasoning in Latent Space for Generative RecommendationZihao Guo, Jian Wang, Ruxin Zhou, Youhua Liu et al.KDD 2026 · 7 citations
