Envy-free Policy Teaching to Multiple Agents
Jiarui Gan, Rupak Majumdar, Adish Singla, Goran Radanovic
Abstract
We study envy-free policy teaching. A number of agents independently explore a common Markov decision process (MDP), but each with their own reward function and discounting rate. A teacher wants to teach a target policy to the diverse group of agents, by way of modifying the agents' reward functions, providing additional bonus to certain behaviors or penalizing others. These reward modifications are personalized for each agent. An important question in this setting concerns how a teaching program can be designed so that the agents think that they are treated fairly. We adopt the fairness notion of envy-freeness (EF) to formalize this question and define three different EF notions, each imposing stronger requirements than the previous one. Using these notions, we then investigate several fundamental questions, including the existence of EF solutions in the policy teaching setting, the computation of cost-minimizing solutions, and the price of fairness (PoF), i.e., the increase in cost due to consideration of fairness. We show that an EF solution may not exist when penalties are not allowed, but exists otherwise. Depending on the cost measures, computing a cost-minimizing EF solution can be formulated as convex or linear programming and hence solved efficiently. Asymptotically, the PoF increases but at most linearly with the geometric sum of the discount factor in general, the size of the MDP, and the number of agents involved. Thus, fairness can be incorporated in multi-agent teaching without significant computational or price-of-fairness burdens.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6f098cb2-d43d-49eb-a267-36e97c2ae021Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Adaptive Reward-Poisoning Attacks against Reinforcement LearningXuezhou Zhang, Yuzhe Ma, Adish Singla, Xiaojin ZhuICML 2020 · 154 citations
- Vulnerability-Aware Poisoning Mechanism for Online RL with Unknown DynamicsYanchao Sun, Da Huo, Furong HuangICLR 2021 · 57 citations
- The Complexity of ContractsPaul Dütting, Tim Roughgarden, Inbal Talgam-CohenSODA 2020 · 26 citations
- Admissible Policy Teaching through Reward DesignKiarash Banihashem, Adish Singla, Jiarui Gan, Goran RadanovicAAAI 2022 · 18 citations
- Inverse Reinforcement Learning From Like-Minded TeachersRitesh Noothigattu, Tom Yan, Ariel D. ProcacciaAAAI 2021 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Fair and Efficient Allocations of Chores under Bivalued PreferencesJugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, John QinAAAI 2022 · 63 citations
- The Price of Connectivity in Fair DivisionXiaohui Bei, Ayumi Igarashi, Xinhang Lu, Warut SuksompongAAAI 2021 · 52 citations
- Achieving Fairness in Multi-Agent MDP Using Reinforcement LearningPeizhong Ju, Arnob Ghosh, Ness B. ShroffICLR 2024 · 8 citations
- Almost Envy-Free Allocations of Indivisible Goods or Chores with EntitlementsMax Springer, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Hadi YamiAAAI 2024
- On Fair and Efficient Allocations of Indivisible GoodsAniket Murhekar, Jugal GargAAAI 2021 · 25 citations
