Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models
Nikola Jovanovic, Robin Staab, Martin T. Vechev
Abstract
LLM watermarking has attracted attention as a promising way to detect AI-generated content, with some works suggesting that current schemes may already be fit for deployment. In this work we dispute this claim, identifying watermark stealing (WS) as a fundamental vulnerability of these schemes. We show that querying the API of the watermarked LLM to approximately reverse-engineer a watermark enables practical spoofing attacks, as hypothesized in prior work, but also greatly boosts scrubbing attacks, which was previously unnoticed. We are the first to propose an automated WS algorithm and use it in the first comprehensive study of spoofing and scrubbing in realistic settings. We show that for under $50 an attacker can both spoof and scrub state-of-the-art schemes previously considered safe, with average success rate of over 80%. Our findings challenge common beliefs about LLM watermarking, stressing the need for more robust schemes. We make all our code and additional examples available at https://watermark-stealing.org.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers42
- On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language ModelsChenchen Gu, Xiang Lisa Li, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2024 · 79 citations
- No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design ChoicesQi Pang, Shengyuan Hu, Wenting Zheng, Virginia SmithNeurIPS 2024 · 56 citations
- Bileve: Securing Text Provenance in Large Language Models Against Spoofing with Bi-level SignatureTong Zhou, Xuandong Zhao, Xiaolin Xu, Shaolei RenNeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations
- Adversarial Paraphrasing: A Universal Attack for Humanizing AI-Generated TextYize Cheng, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Mehrdad Saberi, Shoumik Saha et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- How to Trace Latent Generative Model Generated Images without Artificial Watermark?Zhenting Wang, Vikash Sehwag, Chen Chen, Lingjuan Lyu et al.ICML 2024 · 24 citations
Builds on22
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
- PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationJingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. LiuICML 2020 · 2,453 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
Related papers
- Discovering Spoofing Attempts on Language Model WatermarksThibaud Gloaguen, Nikola Jovanovic, Robin Staab, Martin T. VechevICML 2025
- Protecting Intellectual Property of Large Language Model-Based Code Generation APIs via WatermarksZongjie Li, Chaozheng Wang, Shuai Wang, Cuiyun GaoCCS 2023 · 25 citations
- Enhancing LLM Watermark Resilience Against Both Scrubbing and Spoofing AttacksHuanming Shen, Baizhou Huang, Xiaojun WanNeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Manli Shu et al.ICLR 2024 · 202 citations
- RLCracker: Evaluating the Worst-Case Vulnerability of LLM Watermarks with Adaptive RL AttacksHanbo Huang, Yiran Zhang, Hao Zheng, Xuan Gong et al.ICML 2026
