WiseKG: Balanced Access to Web Knowledge Graphs
Amr Azzam, Christian Aebeloe, Gabriela Montoya, Ilkcan Keles, Axel Polleres, Katja Hose
Abstract
SPARQL query services that balance processing between clients and servers become more and more essential to handle the increasing load for open and decentralized knowledge graphs on the Web. To this end, Linked Data Fragments (LDF) have introduced a foundational framework that has sparked research exploring a spectrum of potential Web querying interfaces in between server-side query processing via SPARQL endpoints and client-side query processing of data dumps. Current proposals in between typically suffer from imbalanced load on either the client or the server. In this paper, to the best of our knowledge, we present the first work that combines both client-side and server-side query optimization techniques in a truly dynamic fashion: we introduce WiseKG, a system that employs a cost model that dynamically delegates the load between servers and clients by combining client-side processing of shipped partitions with efficient server-side processing of star-shaped sub-queries, based on current server workload and client capabilities. Our experiments show that WiseKG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art solutions in terms of average total query execution time per client, while at the same time decreasing network traffic and increasing server-side availability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6eec240b-6aa3-47ac-9794-775753dd9f0bCited by top-tier papers3
- VeriDKG: A Verifiable SPARQL Query Engine for Decentralized Knowledge GraphsEnyuan Zhou, Song Guo, Zicong Hong, Christian S. Jensen et al.VLDB 2024 · 5 citations
- Passage: Ensuring Completeness and Responsiveness of Public SPARQL Endpoints with SPARQL Continuation QueriesThi Hoang Thi Pham, Gabriela Montoya, Brice Nédelec, Hala Skaf-Molli et al.WWW 2025 · 1 citation
- DRAM-like Architecture with Asynchronous Refreshing for Continual Relation ExtractionTianci Bu, Kang Yang, Wenchuan Yang, Jiawei Feng et al.WWW 2024
Builds on2
- G-CARE: A Framework for Performance Benchmarking of Cardinality Estimation Techniques for Subgraph MatchingYeonsu Park, Seongyun Ko, Sourav S. Bhowmick, Kyoungmin Kim et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 59 citations
- SMART-KG: Hybrid Shipping for SPARQL Querying on the WebAmr Azzam, Javier D. Fernández, Maribel Acosta, Martin Beno et al.WWW 2020 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Federated SPARQL Query Processing over Heterogeneous Linked Data FragmentsLars Heling, Maribel AcostaWWW 2022 · 11 citations
- An LLM-Guided Query-Aware Inference System for GNN Models on Large Knowledge GraphsWaleed Afandi, Hussein Abdallah, Ashraf Aboulnaga, Essam MansourICDE 2026
- Efficient Cloud-Edge Collaborative Approaches to Sparql Queries Over Large RDF GraphsShidan Ma, Peng Peng, Xu Zhou, M. Tamer Özsu et al.ICDE 2026 · 1 citation
- Adaptive Low-level Storage of Very Large Knowledge GraphsJacopo Urbani, Ceriel J. H. JacobsWWW 2020 · 10 citations
- FedUP: Querying Large-Scale Federations of SPARQL EndpointsJulien Aimonier-Davat, Brice Nédelec, Minh Hoang Dang, Pascal Molli et al.WWW 2024 · 5 citations
