Learning ABCs: Approximate Bijective Correspondence for isolating factors of variation with weak supervision
Kieran A. Murphy, Varun Jampani, Srikumar Ramalingam, Ameesh Makadia
Abstract
Representational learning forms the backbone of most deep learning applications, and the value of a learned representation is intimately tied to its information content regarding different factors of variation. Finding good representations depends on the nature of supervision and the learning algorithm. We propose a novel algorithm that utilizes a weak form of supervision where the data is partitioned into sets according to certain inactive (common) factors of variation which are invariant across elements of each set. Our key insight is that by seeking correspondence between elements of different sets, we learn strong representations that exclude the inactive factors of variation and isolate the active factors that vary within all sets. As a consequence of focusing on the active factors, our method can leverage a mix of setsupervised and wholly unsupervised data, which can even belong to a different domain. We tackle the challenging problem of synthetic-to-real object pose transfer, without pose annotations on anything, by isolating pose information which generalizes to the category level and across the synthetic/real domain gap. The method can also boost performance in supervised settings, by strengthening intermediate representations, as well as operate in practically attainable scenarios with set-supervised natural images, where quantity is limited and nuisance factors of variation are more plentiful. Accompanying code may be found on github. * Work done as part of the Google AI Residency program. † seas.upenn.edu ‡ google.com
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6e95b6c6-3441-42b1-9b83-95c676bb3ddaCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the HypersphereTongzhou Wang, Phillip IsolaICML 2020 · 2,360 citations
- What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?Yonglong Tian, Chen Sun, Ben Poole, Dilip Krishnan et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,631 citations
- Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from StyleJulius von Kügelgen, Yash Sharma, Luigi Gresele, Wieland Brendel et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 421 citations
- What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive LearningTete Xiao, Xiaolong Wang, Alexei A. Efros, Trevor DarrellICLR 2021 · 338 citations
Related papers
- SD-Pose: Semantic Decomposition for Cross-Domain 6D Object Pose EstimationZhigang Li, Yinlin Hu, Mathieu Salzmann, Xiangyang JiAAAI 2021 · 16 citations
- MAPConNet: Self-supervised 3D Pose Transfer with Mesh and Point Contrastive LearningJiaze Sun, Zhixiang Chen, Tae-Kyun KimICCV 2023 · 2 citations
- Neural View Synthesis and Matching for Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Learning of 3D PoseAngtian Wang, Shenxiao Mei, Alan L. Yuille, Adam KortylewskiNeurIPS 2021 · 22 citations
- Category-Level Articulated Object Pose EstimationXiaolong Li, He Wang, Li Yi, Leonidas J. Guibas et al.CVPR 2020
- Self-Supervised Category-Level Articulated Object Pose Estimation with Part-Level SE(3) EquivarianceXueyi Liu, Ji Zhang, Ruizhen Hu, Haibin Huang et al.ICLR 2023 · 3 citations
