Rethinking Contrastive Learning for Graph Collaborative Filtering: Limitations and a Simple Remedy
Geon Lee, Sunwoo Kim, Kyungho Kim, Kijung Shin
Abstract
Graph collaborative filtering (GCF) is a dominant paradigm in recommender systems, where contrastive learning (CL) objectives such as the Sampled Softmax (SSM) loss are widely used for optimization. However, it remains unclear how CL interacts with the prediction mechanism of GCF. By unfolding the prediction mechanism of GCF, we show that the user-item prediction score is computed by aggregating learnable weights over a large number of neighbor pairs formed by the multi-hop neighbors of the user and the item. This analysis suggests that effective optimization critically depends on which neighbor pairs are upweighted during training. Empirically, we find that effective recommendation is achievable by selectively upweighting only a small subset of neighbor pairs whose constituent neighbors are structurally similar to the target user and item, and that the effect of such selective upweighting varies across different neighbor pair types. Based on these findings, we analyze SSM and identify key limitations in its neighbor pair weight update dynamics. To address these limitations, we propose NT-SSM, an effective and principled CL objective that induces type-aware neighbor pair weight update dynamics. Experiments demonstrate consistent performance improvements over SSM across multiple datasets and GCF models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6e65f504-8be2-4e0f-ade7-8624b057e01dBuilds on10
- LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for RecommendationXiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li et al.SIGIR 2020 · 4,448 citations
- Self-supervised Graph Learning for RecommendationJiancan Wu, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He et al.SIGIR 2021 · 1,476 citations
- Are Graph Augmentations Necessary?: Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for RecommendationJunliang Yu, Hongzhi Yin, Xin Xia, Tong Chen et al.SIGIR 2022 · 658 citations
- Improving Graph Collaborative Filtering with Neighborhood-enriched Contrastive LearningZihan Lin, Changxin Tian, Yupeng Hou, Wayne Xin ZhaoWWW 2022 · 606 citations
- Knowledge Graph Contrastive Learning for RecommendationYuhao Yang, Chao Huang, Lianghao Xia, Chenliang LiSIGIR 2022 · 487 citations
Related papers
- Candidate-aware Graph Contrastive Learning for RecommendationWei He, Guohao Sun, Jinhu Lu, Xiu Susie FangSIGIR 2023 · 64 citations
- Unifying Graph Convolution and Contrastive Learning in Collaborative FilteringYihong Wu, Le Zhang, Fengran Mo, Tianyu Zhu et al.KDD 2024 · 20 citations
- Unveiling Contrastive Learning's Capability of Neighborhood Aggregation for Collaborative FilteringYu Zhang, Yiwen Zhang, Yi Zhang, Lei Sang et al.SIGIR 2025 · 19 citations
- Revisiting Contrastive Learning in Collaborative Filtering via Parallel Graph FiltersFang Kai, Yu Zhang, Kaibin Wang, Lei Sang et al.AAAI 2026
- Path-Enhanced Contrastive Learning for RecommendationHaoran Sun, Fei Xiong, Yuanzhe Hu, Liang WangNeurIPS 2025
