Lean4Physics: Comprehensive Reasoning Framework for College-level Physics in Lean4
Yuxin Li, Minghao Liu, Ruida Wang, Wenzhao Ji, Zhitao He, Rui Pan, Junming Huang, Tong Zhang, Yi R. Fung
Abstract
We present Lean4PHYS, a comprehensive reasoning framework for college-level physics problems in Lean4. To establish a solid foundation for formal reasoning in physics, Lean4PHYS launches PhysLib, a repository containing fundamental unit systems and essential theorems to formulate physics proofs in Lean4. It will be community-driven and long-term maintained. Lean4PHYS also includes LeanPhysBench, a college-level benchmark for evaluating LLMs' Lean4 formal physics reasoning capability. It contains 200 hand-crafted and peer-reviewed Lean4 theorem statements formalized from university textbooks and physics competition problems. Based on the PhysLib and LeanPhysBench we composed in Lean4PHYS, we perform exhaustive experiments of baseline results using major expert Math provers and state-of-the-art closed-source models, and provide an analysis of their performance. In the experiment, we identify that most expert provers do not outperform general models as they did in the math domain. This suggests potential overfitting to the math domain rather than learning formal reasoning for formal provers. We also conduct a comprehensive experiment showing that, with PhysLib in the context, LLMs' performance on LeanPhysBench increases by 11.90% on average, proving the effectiveness of our repository in assisting LLMs in solving the Lean4 physics problem. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first study to provide a physics benchmark in Lean4.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6e4b7b84-a94a-4066-a8cc-c19531087eabCited by top-tier papers2
- Dancing in Chains: Strategic Persuasion in Academic Rebuttal via Theory of MindZhitao He, Zongwei Lyu, Yi R. FungICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- GAR: Generative Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Formal Theorem ProvingRuida Wang, Jiarui Yao, Rui Pan, Shizhe Diao et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on13
- miniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicsKunhao Zheng, Jesse Michael Han, Stanislas PoluICLR 2022 · 342 citations
- Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-CorrectionYong Lin, Shange Tang, Bohan Lyu, Ziran Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 160 citations
- BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem ProvingRan Xin, Chenguang Xi, Jie Yang, Feng Chen et al.ACL 2025 · 66 citations
- PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based ReasoningXinyu Zhang, Yuxuan Dong, Yanrui Wu, Jiaxing Huang et al.ACL 2025 · 51 citations
- Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum LearningStanislas Polu, Jesse Michael Han, Kunhao Zheng, Mantas Baksys et al.ICLR 2023 · 24 citations
Related papers
- UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language ModelsXin Xu, Qiyun Xu, Tong Xiao, Tianhao Chen et al.ICML 2025
- SAIR-Comb : A Structure-Aware Iterative Refinement Framework for Combinatorics AutoformalizationWeijie Jiang, Gaolei He, Beibei Xiong, Jianlin Wang et al.ACL 2026
- Hilbert: Recursively Building Formal Proofs with Informal ReasoningSumanth Varambally, Thomas Voice, Yanchao Sun, Zhifeng Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 62 citations
- FANS: Formal Answer Selection for LLM Natural Language Math Reasoning Using Lean4Jiarui Yao, Ruida Wang, Tong ZhangEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical FormalizationZhongyuan Peng, Yifan Yao, Kaijing Ma, Shuyue Guo et al.ACL 2026 · 15 citations
