Identifying and Upweighting Power-Niche Users to Mitigate Popularity Bias in Recommendations
David Liu, Erik Weis, Moritz Laber, Tina Eliassi-Rad, Brennan Klein
Abstract
Recommender systems have been shown to exhibit popularity bias by over-recommending popular items and under-recommending relevant niche items. We seek to understand niche users in benchmark recommendation datasets as a step toward mitigating popularity bias. We find that, compared to mainstream users, niche-preferring users exhibit a longer-tailed activity-level distribution, indicating the existence of users who both prefer niche items and exhibit high activity levels on platforms. We partition users along two axes: (1) activity level (''power'' vs. ''light'') and (2) item-popularity preference (''mainstream'' vs. ''niche''), and show that in three benchmark datasets, the number of power-niche users (high activity and niche preference) is statistically significantly larger than expected. We also find that interaction data from power-niche users is especially valuable for improving recommendations for not only niche but also mainstream users. In contrast, many existing popularity bias mitigation methods have focused on upweighting niche users regardless of activity level. Motivated by the value of power-niche user data, we propose PAIR (Popularity-and-Activity-Informed Reweighting), a framework for reweighting the Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) loss that simultaneously reweights based on user activity level and item popularity, upweighting power-niche users the most. We instantiate the framework on both deep and shallow collaborative filtering models, and experiments on benchmark datasets show that PAIR reduces popularity bias and can increase overall performance. Although existing popularity-bias mitigation methods yield a trade-off between performance and bias, our results suggest that considering both user activity level and popularity preference leads to Pareto-dominant performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6e2e3b9f-2b47-447e-9bc2-c30a3e4409b7Related papers
- Rethinking Popularity Bias in Collaborative Filtering via Analytical Vector DecompositionLingfeng Liu, Yixin Song, Dazhong Shen, Bing Yin et al.KDD 2026
- Measuring and Mitigating Item Under-Recommendation Bias in Personalized Ranking SystemsZiwei Zhu, Jianling Wang, James CaverleeSIGIR 2020 · 103 citations
- Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item RecommendationQi Wan, Xiangnan He, Xiang Wang, Jiancan Wu et al.WWW 2022 · 46 citations
- Incorporating Bias-aware Margins into Contrastive Loss for Collaborative FilteringAn Zhang, Wenchang Ma, Xiang Wang, Tat-Seng ChuaNeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
- User-oriented Fairness in RecommendationYunqi Li, Hanxiong Chen, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge et al.WWW 2021 · 293 citations
