Structural Approach to Guiding a Present-Biased Agent
Tatiana Belova, Yuriy Dementiev, Artur Ignatiev, Danil Sagunov
Abstract
Time-inconsistent behavior, such as procrastination or abandonment of long-term goals, arises when agents evaluate immediate outcomes disproportionately higher than future ones. This leads to globally suboptimal behavior, where plans are frequently revised or abandoned entirely. In the influential model of Kleinberg and Oren (2014) such behavior is modeled by a present-biased agent navigating a task graph toward a goal, making locally optimal decisions at each step based on discounted future costs. As a result, the agent may repeatedly deviate from initially intended plans.
Recent work by Belova et al. (2024) introduced a two-agent extension of this model, where a fully-aware principal attempts to guide the present-biased agent through a specific set of critical tasks without causing abandonment. This captures a rich class of principal–agent dynamics in behavioral settings.
In this paper, we provide a comprehensive algorithmic characterization of this problem. We analyze its computational complexity through the framework of parameterized algorithms, focusing on graph parameters that naturally emerge in this setting, such as treewidth, vertex cover, and feedback vertex set. Our main result is a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm when parameterized by the treewidth of the task graph and the number of distinct (v,t)-path costs. Our algorithm encaptures several input settings, such as bounded edge costs and restricted task graph structure. We demonstrate that our main result yields efficient algorithms for a number of such configurations.
We complement this with tight hardness results, that highlight the extreme difficulty of the problem even on simplest graphs with bounded number of nodes and constant parameter values, and motivate our choice of parameters. We delineate tractable and intractable regions of the problem landscape, which include answers to open questions of Belova et al. (2024).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6deb09fa-d7ba-4516-8618-8ea45b00c0ecBuilds on3
- Time-Inconsistent Planning: Simple Motivation Is Hard to FindFedor V. Fomin, Torstein J. F. StrømmeAAAI 2020 · 4 citations
- Analytically Tractable Models for Decision Making under Present BiasYasunori Akagi, Naoki Marumo, Takeshi KurashimaAAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- A Continuous-time Tractable Model for Present-biased AgentsYasunori Akagi, Hideaki Kim, Takeshi KurashimaAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Present-Biased OptimizationFedor V. Fomin, Pierre Fraigniaud, Petr A. GolovachAAAI 2021 · 6 citations
- Inconsistent Planning: When in Doubt, Toss a Coin!Yuriy Dementiev, Fedor V. Fomin, Artur IgnatievAAAI 2022 · 4 citations
- Exact Algorithms and Lowerbounds for Multiagent Path Finding: Power of Treelike TopologyFoivos Fioravantes, Dusan Knop, Jan Matyás Kristan, Nikolaos Melissinos et al.AAAI 2024 · 12 citations
- Delta Matters: An Analytically Tractable Model for beta-delta Discounting AgentsYasunori Akagi, Takeshi KurashimaAAAI 2026
- Solving Multiagent Path Finding on Highly Centralized NetworksFoivos Fioravantes, Dusan Knop, Jan Matyás Kristan, Nikolaos Melissinos et al.AAAI 2025 · 5 citations
