Learning Facts at Scale with Active Reading
Jessy Lin, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Xilun Chen, Wen-tau Yih, Gargi Ghosh, Barlas Oguz
Abstract
LLMs are known to store vast amounts of knowledge in their parametric memory. However, learning and recalling facts from this memory is known to be unreliable, depending largely on the prevalence of particular facts in the training data and other factors which are poorly understood. Practitioners are lacking tools which will allow them to ensure that the models learn a given body of knowledge reliably and consistently. To this end, we propose Active Reading: a framework where we train models to study a given set of material with self-generated learning strategies. First, we demonstrate models trained with Active Reading on expert domains absorb significantly more knowledge than vanilla finetuning and other data augmentations. We train expert 8B models that achieve 66% on a Wikipedia-grounded subset of SimpleQA (+313% relative over vanilla finetuning) and 26% on FinanceBench (+160% relative over vanilla finetuning) by applying Active Reading to the source documents for each benchmark. Finally, we show that Active Reading can be utilized at pre-training scale to build more factual models. As a demonstration of this, we release Meta WikiExpert-8B, a Wikipedia-expert model trained on 1 trillion generated tokens, which outcompetes models with hundreds of billions of parameters on factual QA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Understanding LoRA as Knowledge Memory: An Empirical AnalysisSeungju Back, Dongwoo Lee, Naun Kang, Taehee Lee et al.ICML 2026 · 10 citations
- Empty Shelves or Lost Keys? Recall Is the Bottleneck for Parametric FactualityNitay Calderon, Eyal Ben-David, Zorik Gekhman, Eran Ofek et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Rote Learning Considered Useful: Generalizing over Memorized Data in LLMsQinyuan Wu, Soumi Das, Mahsa Amani, Bishwamittra Ghosh et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- SPA: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge InjectionKexian Tang, Jiani Wang, Shaowen Wang, Kaifeng LyuICML 2026
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail KnowledgeNikhil Kandpal, Haikang Deng, Adam Roberts, Eric Wallace et al.ICML 2023 · 623 citations
- Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search IndexYi Tay, Vinh Tran, Mostafa Dehghani, Jianmo Ni et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 506 citations
- Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language ModelsKushal Tirumala, Aram H. Markosyan, Luke Zettlemoyer, Armen AghajanyanNeurIPS 2022 · 304 citations
- Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and ExtractionZeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi LiICML 2024 · 258 citations
Related papers
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal et al.EMNLP 2024 · 53 citations
- Cite Pretrain: Retrieval-Free Knowledge Attribution for Large Language ModelsYukun Huang, Sanxing Chen, Jian Pei, Manzil Zaheer et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMsOded Ovadia, Menachem Brief, Moshik Mishaeli, Oren ElishaEMNLP 2024 · 89 citations
