Context and POS in Action: A Comparative Study of Chinese Homonym Disambiguation in Human and Language Models
Chenwei Xie, Matthew King-Hang Ma, Wenbo Wang, William Shi-Yuan Wang
Abstract
Ambiguity is pervasive in language, yet we resolve it effortlessly and unconsciously, often aided by context and part-of-speech (POS) cues. This study investigates how context similarity and POS influence homonym disambiguation in humans and large language models (LLMs). To enable comparable analyses between humans and LLMs, we first built an expert-curated sentence-pair dataset, manipulating context similarity and homonym POS categories (nouns vs. verbs). Participants (n = 55) and LLMs (via prompting) were asked to rate the sense similarity of target homonyms embedded within each sentence on a 7-point Likert scale. We found that context similarity influenced both groups similarly, but only humans utilized POS information, likely contributing to their superior performance. Modelderived metrics (surprisal, entropy) predicted human reaction times, and angular similarity between homonym representations accounted for additional variance, highlighting the roles of both expectation-based and semantic processes. Psycholinguistic factors like age of acquisition affected only human responses, underscoring distinct language acquisition mechanisms. Together, our findings illustrate how context and POS information interactively shape homonym resolution in humans, while exposing the limitations of current language models in capturing these nuanced processes. Dataset and codes are publicly available at https://github.com/ neurothew/context-and-pos-in-action .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on6
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
- Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice SelectorsChujie Zheng, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 424 citations
- Questioning the Survey Responses of Large Language ModelsRicardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Moritz Hardt, Celestine Mendler-DünnerNeurIPS 2024 · 116 citations
- Exploring the Representation of Word Meanings in Context: A Case Study on Homonymy and SynonymyMarcos GarcíaACL 2021
Related papers
- Correct-Detect: Balancing Performance and Ambiguity Through the Lens of Coreference Resolution in LLMsAmber Shore, Russell Scheinberg, Ameeta Agrawal, So Young LeeEMNLP 2025
- Rolling the DICE on Idiomaticity: How LLMs Fail to Grasp ContextMaggie Mi, Aline Villavicencio, Nafise Sadat MoosaviACL 2025 · 9 citations
- EMODIS: A Benchmark for Context-Dependent Emoji Disambiguation in Large Language ModelsJiacheng Huang, Ning Yu, Xiaoyin YiAAAI 2026
- FOOL ME IF YOU CAN! An Adversarial Dataset to Investigate the Robustness of LMs in Word Sense DisambiguationMohamad Ballout, Anne Dedert, Nohayr Abdelmoneim, Ulf Krumnack et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Do LLMs Capture Embodied Cognition and Cultural Variation? Cross-Linguistic Evidence from DemonstrativesYu Wang, Emmanuele Chersoni, Chu-Ren HuangACL 2026
