Prediction with Expert Advice under Local Differential Privacy
Ben Jacobsen, Kassem Fawaz
Abstract
We study the classic problem of prediction with expert advice under the constraint of local differential privacy (LDP). In this context, we first show that a classical algorithm naturally satisfies LDP and then design two new algorithms that improve it: RW-AdaBatch and RW-Meta. For RW-AdaBatch, we exploit the limited-switching behavior induced by LDP to provide a novel form of privacy amplification that grows stronger on easier data, analogous to the shuffle model in offline learning. Drawing on the theory of random walks, we prove that this improvement carries essentially no utility cost. For RW-Meta, we develop a general method for privately selecting between experts that are themselves non-trivial learning algorithms, and we show that in the context of LDP this carries no extra privacy cost. In contrast, prior work has only considered data-independent experts. We also derive formal regret bounds that scale inversely with the degree of independence between experts. Our analysis is supplemented by evaluation on real-world data reported by hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic; RW-Meta outperforms both the classical baseline and a state-of-the-art central DP algorithm by 1.5-3 on the task of predicting which hospital will report the highest density of COVID patients each week.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6cf448e4-45f2-4842-ac3e-c3b352aefee3Builds on14
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical and Private (Deep) Learning Without Sampling or ShufflingPeter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Shuang Song, Om Thakkar et al.ICML 2021 · 239 citations
- Is Interaction Necessary for Distributed Private Learning?Adam D. Smith, Abhradeep Thakurta, Jalaj UpadhyayS&P 2017 · 159 citations
- Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive StreamsSergey Denisov, H. Brendan McMahan, John Rush, Adam D. Smith et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 96 citations
- Continuous Release of Data Streams under both Centralized and Local Differential PrivacyTianhao Wang, Joann Qiongna Chen, Zhikun Zhang, Dong Su et al.CCS 2021 · 66 citations
Related papers
- Shuffle Private Linear Contextual BanditsSayak Ray Chowdhury, Xingyu ZhouICML 2022 · 29 citations
- On Differentially Private Federated Linear Contextual BanditsXingyu Zhou, Sayak Ray ChowdhuryICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- Communication Efficient and Differentially Private Logistic Regression under the Distributed SettingErgute Bao, Dawei Gao, Xiaokui Xiao, Yaliang LiKDD 2023 · 2 citations
- Robust and private stochastic linear banditsVasileios Charisopoulos, Hossein Esfandiari, Vahab MirrokniICML 2023 · 10 citations
- Tracking The Best Expert PrivatelyHilal Asi, Vinod Raman, Aadirupa SahaICML 2025
