NeRF Director: Revisiting View Selection in Neural Volume Rendering
Wenhui Xiao, Rodrigo Santa Cruz, David Ahmedt-Aristizabal, Olivier Salvado, Clinton Fookes, Léo Lebrat
Abstract
Neural Rendering representations have significantly contributed to the field of 3D computer vision. Given their potential, considerable efforts have been invested to improve their performance. Nonetheless, the essential question of selecting training views is yet to be thoroughly investigated. This key aspect plays a vital role in achieving high-quality results and aligns with the well-known tenet of deep learning: “garbage in, garbage out”. In this paper, we first illustrate the importance of view selection by demonstrating how a simple rotation of the test views within the most pervasive NeRF dataset can lead to consequential shifts in the performance rankings of state-of-the-art techniques. To address this challenge, we introduce a unified framework for view selection methods and devise a thorough benchmark to assess its impact. Significant improvements can be achieved without leveraging error or uncertainty estimation but focusing on uniform view coverage of the reconstructed object, resulting in a training-free approach. Using this technique, we show that high-quality renderings can be achieved faster by using fewer views. We conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic datasets and realistic data to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method compared with random, conventional error-based, and uncertainty-guided view selection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6cd3504f-54ed-46af-920a-88a393223f96Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encodingThomas Müller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, Alexander KellerSIGGRAPH 2022 · 4,089 citations
- Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance FieldsJonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Matthew Tancik, Peter Hedman et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,700 citations
- Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural NetworksSara Fridovich-Keil, Alex Yu, Matthew Tancik, Qinhong Chen et al.CVPR 2022 · 1,237 citations
- BARF: Bundle-Adjusting Neural Radiance FieldsChen-Hsuan Lin, Wei-Chiu Ma, Antonio Torralba, Simon LuceyICCV 2021 · 867 citations
- Putting NeRF on a Diet: Semantically Consistent Few-Shot View SynthesisAjay Jain, Matthew Tancik, Pieter AbbeelICCV 2021 · 615 citations
Related papers
- RegNeRF: Regularizing Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis from Sparse InputsMichael Niemeyer, Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi et al.CVPR 2022 · 513 citations
- NeRFLiX: High-Quality Neural View Synthesis by Learning a Degradation-Driven Inter-viewpoint MiXerKun Zhou, Wenbo Li, Yi Wang, Tao Hu et al.CVPR 2023
- Peering into the Unknown: Active View Selection with Neural Uncertainty Maps for 3D ReconstructionZhengquan Zhang, Feng Xu, Mengmi ZhangICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Volume Feature Rendering for Fast Neural Radiance Field ReconstructionKang Han, Wei Xiang, Lu YuNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- Neural Sparse Voxel FieldsLingjie Liu, Jiatao Gu, Kyaw Zaw Lin, Tat-Seng Chua et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,535 citations
