Method, Mind, and Morality: How People Make Sense of Artificial Intelligence
Jacy Reese Anthis, Erik Brynjolfsson, James Allen Evans
Abstract
How can humans make sense of the rapid takeoff of artificial intelligence (AI)? We studied the sensemaking dynamics of AI through an open-ended, mixed-methods study with computational text analysis of millions of AI-related newspaper articles and social media posts grounded in 57 semi-structured interviews with AI professionals in 2021 and 2023-before and after the recent surge of public interest. We identify a range of sociological frames (interpretive schemas that structure collective cognition) and show how AI professionals use frames to address significant cognitive challenges, such as assigning responsibility for societal impacts. We develop a framework of three primary debates across which frames are adopted and contested: (i) the method of AI development, between frames of top-down expert systems and bottom-up emergent capabilities, (ii) the mind of an AI system, ranging from a passive tool to a humanlike "digital mind, " and (iii) the morality of how AI is used, particularly the decision of whether to slow down or speed up AI development. As humanity enters the era of transformative AI, technologists and policymakers must account for the framing dynamics that will circumscribe our beliefs, values, and actions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6c95fe7e-38d5-474e-b58f-21ebdab4dc07Builds on37
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design ConsiderationsDuri Long, Brian MagerkoCHI 2020 · 2,947 citations
- Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2023 · 796 citations
- Conceptual Metaphors Impact Perceptions of Human-AI CollaborationPranav Khadpe, Ranjay Krishna, Li Fei-Fei, Jeffrey T. Hancock et al.CSCW 2020 · 179 citations
- Trauma-Informed Computing: Towards Safer Technology Experiences for AllJanet X. Chen, Allison McDonald, Yixin Zou, Emily Tseng et al.CHI 2022 · 163 citations
Related papers
- Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI ChallengesQiaosi Wang, Michael Madaio, Shaun K. Kane, Shivani Kapania et al.CHI 2023 · 90 citations
- Mindful Explanations: Prevalence and Impact of Mind Attribution in XAI ResearchSusanne Hindennach, Lei Shi, Filip Miletic, Andreas BullingCSCW 2024 · 7 citations
- Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for Shifting Organizational PracticesBogdana Rakova, Jingying Yang, Henriette Cramer, Rumman ChowdhuryCSCW 2021 · 326 citations
- Perceptions of Sentient AI and Other Digital Minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) SurveyJacy Reese Anthis, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Ali Ladak, Aikaterina ManoliCHI 2025 · 24 citations
- Tracing Everyday AI Literacy Discussions at Scale: How Online Creative Communities Make Sense of Generative AIHaidan Liu, Poorvi Bhatia, Nicholas Vincent, Parmit K. ChilanaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
